Re: anyone still using fail2ban

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Erik Berndt wrote: > We use a Tomcat filter and it works just fine for Guacamole. > > Filter: > > # Fail2Ban tomcat filter > # > [INCLUDES] > # > [Definition] > failregex = \bAuthentication attempt from \[(?:,.*)?\] for user ".*"

Re: anyone still using fail2ban

Whilst not a guacamole issue it does reflect on it's usability so just in case anyone else comes across this possibly after an "upgrade" I have traced back the regular expression seen in a few places on the web and discovered that a change has occurred either in the writing or reading of the

Re: anyone still using fail2ban

zhu...@gmail.com> To: user <user@guacamole.apache.org>; mdbuk <md...@aol.com> Sent: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:31 Subject: Re: anyone still using fail2ban This works fine [Definition] failregex = \bAuthentication attempt from \[(?:,.*)?\] fo

Re: anyone still using fail2ban

This works fine [Definition] failregex = \bAuthentication attempt from \[(?:,.*)?\] for user ".*" faile d\. [Init] maxlines = 2 2018-05-16 23:25 GMT+03:00 mdbarber : > to cover guacamole? > using it to protect a webmin instance but the default

anyone still using fail2ban

to cover guacamole? using it to protect a webmin instance but the default gucamole filter doesn't work and all the documentation i can find regarding syntax for filters is out of date. Any hints please? regards mdb --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.