AW: tree support in user-mapping.xml

Von: Nick Couchman [mailto:nick.e.couch...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 30. April 2018 01:38 An: user@guacamole.apache.org Betreff: Re: tree support in user-mapping.xml On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 15:52 Joachim Lindenberg <joac...@lindenberg.one <mailto:joac...@lindenberg.one>

Re: AW: tree support in user-mapping.xml

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 16:13 Paulo Gonçalves wrote: > I agree with you about the resources usage just for that. > > Maybe you can try to use a H2 database with MySQL Compatibility Mode (I > don't know if it works, never tried it). > I did start working on a SQLite module

Re: tree support in user-mapping.xml

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 15:52 Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I totally disagree. The delta is not just time, but the need of a full > blown database that I need to operate with plenty of cpu, memory, and disk > usage. > I understand your point, but the

Re: AW: tree support in user-mapping.xml

@apache.org] > GESENDET: Sonntag, 29. April 2018 21:41 > AN: user@guacamole.apache.org > BETREFF: Re: tree support in user-mapping.xml > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Joachim Lindenberg <joac...@lindenberg.one> > wrote: > >> Hello, >>

Re: tree support in user-mapping.xml

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hello, > > I do have my extension for Hyper-V, that does authentication and > authorizations for my Hyper-V guests. However I also would like to include > some of my infrastructure (SSH, VNC, etc.) into the

tree support in user-mapping.xml

Hello, I do have my extension for Hyper-V, that does authentication and authorizations for my Hyper-V guests. However I also would like to include some of my infrastructure (SSH, VNC, etc.) into the solution – and preferably not as a flat list but with some hierarchy. I do understand that I can