Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-07-31 Thread Mike Jumper
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Herzog wrote: > I would be more than interested, too! > > Mike, is the MIT licensed "poorly implemented" version publicly available? > Could you publicize it otherwise? > No, this is incorrect. If it were MIT-licensed, yes, we could indeed do as you suggest. The

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-07-21 Thread Herzog
in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session-Sharing-tp1080p1358.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-07-11 Thread Mike Jumper
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Swift wrote: > I'm a little confused. Isn't remotefx a strictly (or mainly) server side > solution, so that so long as we enable remotefx on the WinServer 2016 > server, all we need is a "plain old" rdp client (eg normal guacamole) and > it > should work?

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-07-11 Thread Jonathan Swift
nder + 5 part-time developers, but I'm sure we can help.) -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session-Sharing-tp1080p1277.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Herzog
Thanks a lot! -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session-Sharing-tp1080p1090.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Jumper
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Herzog wrote: > ... > > I am trying to integrate Guacamole into my bachelor thesis project (a web > app of it's own). > > ... > > I am now trying to implement a session sharing feature. And after stumbling > across another code of yours, I would try the following fo

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Herzog
mole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session-Sharing-tp1080p1086.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Jumper
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Herzog wrote: > Would it be sufficient to keep an instance of the initial > ConfiguredGuacamoleSocket, e.g. in a Map and return a new instance of > SimpleGuacamoleTunnel(existingConfiguredSocket)? > Can you describe what you're trying to do? Guacamole already sup

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Herzog
Would it be sufficient to keep an instance of the initial ConfiguredGuacamoleSocket, e.g. in a Map and return a new instance of SimpleGuacamoleTunnel(existingConfiguredSocket)? -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session

Re: RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Jumper
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Herzog wrote: > Hello together, > > I have two more questions :-) > > 1. Does guacamole support RemoteFX? > No, this is not implemented. > Guacamole seems to use FreeRDP, which does. Yet, there is an open ticket > which indicated that someone wrote a piece of cod

RemoteFX & Session Sharing

2017-06-07 Thread Herzog
that drains performance if the host is not well connected, while RDP does not seem to support multiple connections. -- View this message in context: http://apache-guacamole-incubating-users.2363388.n4.nabble.com/RemoteFX-Session-Sharing-tp1080.html Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users