I'm +1 for 1 more release in 2.8.x and declare that 2.8 is EoL.
> would be even happier if we could move people to 2.9.x
Agreed.
-Akira
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:59 PM Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
> I'm in favour of 1 more release (it fixes the off-by 1 bug in
> S3AInputStream HADOOP-16109), but
I've never understood the fixation of staying on 2.x versions of Hadoop.
The Apache Group folks who attend to Hadoop - there are only so many of
them and their time and attention have to be spread among both new
development and bug fixes in both branches. At some point, any effort
directed
I'm in favour of 1 more release (it fixes the off-by 1 bug in
S3AInputStream HADOOP-16109), but would be even happier if we could move
people to 2.9.x
maybe do a 2.9.x release and declare that 2.8 is EOL?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
> My bad -- Didn't realize I was
My bad -- Didn't realize I was looking at the old Hadoop page.
Here's the correct list of releases. https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> IIRC we have a 2.8.5 release?
>
> On the download page:
>
> 2.8.5 2018 Sep 15
>
> Wei-Chiu Chuang
Thanks everybody for sharing your thoughts. I saw positive feedbacks from
20+ contributors!
So I think we should move it forward, any suggestions about what we should
do?
Best,
Wangda
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:36 PM neo wrote:
> +1, This is neo from TiDB & TiKV community.
> Thanks Xun for
IIRC we have a 2.8.5 release?
On the download page:
2.8.5 2018 Sep 15
Wei-Chiu Chuang 于2019年7月25日周四 上午9:39写道：
> The last 2.8 release (2.8.4) was made in the last May, more than a year
> ago. https://hadoop.apache.org/old/releases.html
>
> How do folks feel about the fate of branch-2.8? During
