Re: Negative value given by getVirtualCores() or getAvailableResources()

Hi Wangda, I was actually wondering why should it give me -ve value for vcores when I call getAvailableResources(). Thanks, Kishore On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Wangda Tan wheele...@gmail.com wrote: By default, vcore = 1 for each resource request. If you don't like this behavior, you

Re: Negative value given by getVirtualCores() or getAvailableResources()

By default, vcore = 1 for each resource request. If you don't like this behavior, you can set yarn.scheduler.minimum-allocation-vcores=0 Hope this helps, Wangda Tan On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri write2kish...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am calling

Negative value given by getVirtualCores() or getAvailableResources()

Hi, I am calling getAvailableResources() on AMRMClientAsync and getting -ve value for the number virtual cores as below. Is there something wrong? memory:16110, vCores:-2. I have set the vcores in my yarn-site.xml like this, and just ran an application that requires two containers other than