Re: Re: Poor performance of table Increment

ealize this is just a test),so to test whether this is related to > Increment, can you replace the Increment by Put and see how long that takes? > > > >-- Lars > > > > From: 陆巍 <luwei...@163.com> > > To: user@hbase.apache.org > > Sent: Saturday, July 9,

Re:Re: Poor performance of table Increment

and see how long that takes? > >-- Lars > > From: 陆巍 <luwei...@163.com> > To: user@hbase.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 3:14 AM > Subject: Poor performance of table Increment > >Hi, > >I had a test for Increment operation, and find the p

Re: Poor performance of table Increment

? -- Lars From: 陆巍 <luwei...@163.com> To: user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 3:14 AM Subject: Poor performance of table Increment Hi, I had a test for Increment operation, and find the performance is really bad: 94809ms for 1000 increment operaions. The testing c

Re:Re: Poor performance of table Increment

thanks Ted, It is very related. I am using 1.0 and will upgrade to 1.2 for another test. At 2016-07-09 19:45:51, "Ted Yu" wrote: >Which release of hbase are you using ? > >Does it include HBASE-15213 ? > >Thanks > >On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, 陆巍

Re: Poor performance of table Increment

Which release of hbase are you using ? Does it include HBASE-15213 ? Thanks On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, 陆巍 wrote: > Hi, > > I had a test for Increment operation, and find the performance is really > bad: 94809ms for 1000 increment operaions. > The testing cluster is

Poor performance of table Increment

Hi, I had a test for Increment operation, and find the performance is really bad: 94809ms for 1000 increment operaions. The testing cluster is pretty small with only three region servers. Below is the code for testing. Is there any bentchmark result for htable increment? Thanks! import