I forgot to mention this is on Ignite 2.6.0 and i'm running with a 3 node
cluster.
I've been experimenting some more and I'm finding that using PARTITIONED
caches works fine, but replicated caches stop expiring usually within 10
minutes. The behavior is very consistent.
I plan on trying this
In the above example,
is setting " "
in xml config file same as adding a jvmoption "-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=8g" ?
or its different?
Can somone please clarify?
Thanks
...summa
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Here is a gist to run Ignite.NET in Docker on Linux & .NET Core:
https://gist.github.com/ptupitsyn/1cbbdaef1fef7cc4be22addda19cade4
Confirmed to work with Ignite.NET Client on Windows.
Let me know if you need more info.
Looks like you use some event API with remote filters, make sure that
remote
Created https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10791 for this
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Thanks for your support, but I need more informations. Let me try to give
you more details:
I've launched a ignite node on docker with this command:
docker run -it --rm --name ignite --net=host apacheignite/ignite
Then I try to connect to my dotnet client with this configuration:
Snippet
Ignite
Hi,
Are you sure it is only the first write?
I’m not aware of any lazy initialization there, so I wouldn’t expect the first
write to be slow.
Which version do you use?
And what is the performance difference of the first transaction compared to the
second?
I have two ideas why it may work
Hello!
As far as my understanding goes, Apache Ignite authentication only affects
thin clients (such as JDBC or native Python/PHP/C# client).
You can add authorization include client node join checks, but that will
require custom plugin implementation.
See
Hello!
There is a ticket to make those messages more clear:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10760
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пт, 21 дек. 2018 г. в 11:31, aa...@tophold.com :
> Thanks for clarify!
>
> Regards
> Aaron
>
>
> *From:* Loredana Radulescu Ivanoff
> *Date:* 2018-12-21
Thanks for clarify!
Regards
Aaron
From: Loredana Radulescu Ivanoff
Date: 2018-12-21 02:40
To: user
Subject: Re: Re: Partition-exchanger blocked after upgrade to 2.7
Hello,
We've been witnessing a similar set of logs from Apache Ignite after upgrading
to 2.7 (from 2.6) in a couple of