Re: Performance issues with Ignite L2 cache compared to ehcache

2016-10-04 Thread Himetic
sense for us, unfortunately. Failure, however, is always an option. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Performance-issues-with-Ignite-L2-cache-compared-to-ehcache-tp8069p8086.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance issues with Ignite L2 cache compared to ehcache

2016-10-03 Thread vkulichenko
into the application and measure performance. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Performance-issues-with-Ignite-L2-cache-compared-to-ehcache-tp8069p8071.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance issues with Ignite L2 cache compared to ehcache

2016-10-03 Thread Alexey Kuznetsov
Is there a way to mitigate this problem? Maybe a way to do a batch query > against the L2 database? I'm guessing not, but otherwise I'm not sure what > else we could do to avoid these performance issues. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. &g

Performance issues with Ignite L2 cache compared to ehcache

2016-10-03 Thread Himetic
://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Performance-issues-with-Ignite-L2-cache-compared-to-ehcache-tp8069.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.