Re: AtomicSequence not performing well with 2 nodes cluster set up

GB, I am not sure if you see any difference since you will be updating the same cache entry which does not scale much. Sequence and IgniteAtomicLong work exactly in the same way. --Yakov 2016-12-08 22:15 GMT+07:00 GB : > Hi, > What if we create an ignite cache having

Database Connection Pooling

Hi Team, Can some one help me understand what is the need of Database Connection Pooling in Ignite. If there are any links to the explanation or code that should be good. Thanks Saji -- View this message in context:

Re: How can I call a Java Service from .NET

Pavel, Fixed all the places including that .NET block. — Denis > On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:35 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > > Denis, > > There is a callout at the top of > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/service-grid >

Re: AtomicSequence not performing well with 2 nodes cluster set up

Hi, What if we create an ignite cache having "SeqId" and increment its value using EntryProcessor whenever we want to generate next sequence, not sure if that can be faster? Something like : int nxtInSeq = configCache.invoke(KEY_PMT_ID_COUNTER, new CounterEntryProcessor()); -- View this

Re: How can I call a Java Service from .NET

Denis, There is a callout at the top of https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/service-grid page which says "Note that it's required that all nodes have service classes deployed locally, otherwise Service Grid will not be fully-functional. Peer-deployment is not supported for services.". This