GB, I am not sure if you see any difference since you will be updating the same cache entry which does not scale much. Sequence and IgniteAtomicLong work exactly in the same way.
--Yakov 2016-12-08 22:15 GMT+07:00 GB <[email protected]>: > Hi, > What if we create an ignite cache having "SeqId" and increment its value > using EntryProcessor whenever we want to generate next sequence, not sure > if > that can be faster? > Something like : > > int nxtInSeq = configCache.invoke(KEY_PMT_ID_COUNTER, new > CounterEntryProcessor()); > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. > 70518.x6.nabble.com/AtomicSequence-not-performing- > well-with-2-nodes-cluster-set-up-tp9208p9449.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
