On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic
wrote:
> Hi Yakov,
>
> yes, thanks for the comments, I think everything should be ok now,
> please review the PR and tell me if you think anything else is needed.
>
> Once ignite-642 is merged into master,
> I'll submit a
Vlad, did you have a chance to review my latest comments?
Thanks!
--
Yakov Zhdanov, Director R
*GridGain Systems*
www.gridgain.com
2016-03-06 12:21 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> Vlad and all (esp Val and Anton V.),
>
> I reviewed the PR. My comments are in the ticket.
>
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Christos Erotocritou <
chris...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> We already have a basic FAQ page which I am populating:
> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq <
> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq>
>
> Please feel free to add to it.
>
Thanks Christos! Here
Ah, I realise now that this FAQ you are talking about is probably more of a dev
one where as the one I’ve created is more product focused.
Christos
> On 11 Mar 2016, at 18:20, Christos Erotocritou wrote:
>
> We already have a basic FAQ page which I am populating:
>
+1 on FAQ
Can we just create a page, and start populating it?
D.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> Yakov,
>
> I've answered.
> Seems we have to have special FAQ section at Ignite wiki to publish same
> things.
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:21
Yakov,
I've answered.
Seems we have to have special FAQ section at Ignite wiki to publish same
things.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Vlad and all (esp Val and Anton V.),
>
> I reviewed the PR. My comments are in the ticket.
>
> Anton V. there is a
Vlad and all (esp Val and Anton V.),
I reviewed the PR. My comments are in the ticket.
Anton V. there is a question regarding optimized-classnames.properties. Can
you please respond in ticket?
--Yakov
2016-02-29 16:00 GMT+06:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> Vlad, that's great! I
Vlad, that's great! I will take a look this week. Reassigning ticket to
myself.
--Yakov
2016-02-26 18:37 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic :
> Hi,
>
> i recently implemented distributed ReentrantLock - IGNITE-642,
> i made a pull request, so hopefully this could be added to the
-on-tryAcquire-while-holding-a-cache-lock-tp3031p3088.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Folks,
The current implementation of IgniteCache.lock(key).lock() has the same
semantics as the transactional locks - cache topology cannot be changed
while there exists an ongoing transaction or an explicit lock is held. The
restriction for transactions is quite fundamental, the lock() issue can
tryAcquire() call starts
>> blocking.
>>
>> Is this this a known limitation/issue or am I doing something wrong here?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Mario
>>
>> ps: when I replace the cache-lock with an other semaphore, it works
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Semaphore-blocking-on-tryAcquire-while-holding-a-cache-lock-tp3031.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Semaphore-blocking-on-tryAcquire-while-holding-a-cache-lock-tp3031.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 matches
Mail list logo