Re: Karaf freezes up under MS-Windows

2018-11-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Tom, I'm not able to reproduce on the Win7 VM. Can you provide some details: JDK version, Windows language, ... ? Thanks, Regards JB On 30/11/2018 05:56, tom leung wrote: > Based on the latest Apache Karaf v4.1.7, run it on Windows 7. > > Still freeze up at Windows side after entering the

Re: Karaf freezes up under MS-Windows

2018-11-29 Thread tom leung
Based on the latest Apache Karaf v4.1.7, run it on Windows 7. Still freeze up at Windows side after entering the command "list - t 0" but the same symptom never happen at Linux side. So the bug is really related to MS-Windows. May you file this symptom as a bug. Best Rgds, Tom Leung On

RE: Aries

2018-11-29 Thread Leschke, Scott
So, the implication seems to be that the Subsystem spec is effectively broken and not worth pursuing. It sounds as if it's simultaneously too complicated and yet not complicated enough. Note that I'm not saying that's the case but that's what I take from what's written below and it's apparent

[ANN] Apache Karaf 4.1.7 released !

2018-11-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The Apache Karaf team is pleased to announce Apache Karaf 4.1.7 release! This is a maintenance release on the 4.1.x series, bringing fixes and minor updates. You take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311140=12343797 You

Re: karaf-maven-plugin verify - ignore missing blueprint references

2018-11-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
AFAIR, if you have at least one feature providing the service, it should work. Does it mean that today, your features repo just contains the "service" client feature, not at least one feature providing the service ? I think I understand your use case: you want to verify an "open" feature,

Re: karaf-maven-plugin verify - ignore missing blueprint references

2018-11-29 Thread Jesse White
Hi JB, Yeah, that is correct. Thanks, Jesse On 2018-11-29 12:14 a.m., Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > just to understand your use case. > > Verify is failing because you have a requirement on service active right ? > So that's why you have to add a features containing a bundle