variable, but then never does anything with it.
Should KARAF-2291 be reopened for v3.0.1?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Talbut
Sent: 16 May 2014 10:40
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Creating instances on dedicated IP addresses rather than varying the
ports
Continuing this:
http
yep, something wrong on the Karaf 3.x, but it works with Karaf 2.x, I'm on it
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
On 2014-5-16, at 下午5:39, Jim Talbut wrote:
Continuing this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/karaf-user/201402.mbox/browser
Hi,
Fixed by KARAF-2989.
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
On 2014-5-20, at 上午11:00, Freeman Fang wrote:
yep, something wrong on the Karaf 3.x, but it works with Karaf 2.x, I'm on it
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
Continuing this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/karaf-user/201402.mbox/browser
Setting up an instance (olt) using karaf 3.0.1 and configuring a
default.interface as follows:
etc/org.apache.karaf.shell.cfg:sshHost = ${default.interface}
Hi,
Continuing this from a few months ago:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Creating-instances-on-dedicated-IP-addresses-rather-than-varying-the-ports-td4031528.html
Setting up an instance (olt) using karaf 3.0.1 and configuring a
default.interface as follows:
etc
Hi,
I want to create a bunch of Karaf instances with each running on a
dedicated IP address with the same ports rather than all using all IP
addresses and different ports.
For our infrastructure this is much easier to manage (giving a greater
consistency with only one variable for each
Hi Jim,
you can already do that by changing the configuration file.
What I do: in etc/custom.properties, I set default.interface property
and I use it in all other configuration files (${default.interface}).
I planned to add -b option to easily change the bound interface/IP
(actually
Hi JB,
Thanks.
Is an instance anything more than the collection of files in the instances
directory?
I.e. if I just created the files there myself would it be recognised by the
instance module?
Tanks again
Jim
On 5 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Jim,
