Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-12-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
novembre 2015 15:37 À : user@karaf.apache.org Objet : RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup The "$(PARAM)" first-time-issue also happens with property-placeholder which uses the default update-strategy (none). I suspect the user bundles to be started before the

RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-12-01 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
May I open a new Jira? JP [@@ OPEN @@] -Message d'origine- De : CLEMENT Jean-Philippe [mailto:jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2015 15:37 À : user@karaf.apache.org Objet : RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup The "$(PARAM)&q

Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
Dear Karaf Team, I have a strange behavior with Karaf (*) when started for the first time. A bean is started then stopped then re-started. This behavior is not 100% reproducible but happens maybe one-half of the time. That bean is instantiated via Blueprint and uses a property-placeholder with

Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi JP, I don't think it's related to blueprint. It's more the way a ManagedService works. First the activator starts, and then it will react to the ManagedService via the update() method. I guess it's what you see there. Regards JB On 11/26/2015 02:04 PM, CLEMENT Jean-Philippe wrote:

Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi, yes I would even go further and say it's an expected behavior. so nothing to worry about. regards, Achim 2015-11-26 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi JP, > > I don't think it's related to blueprint. > > It's more the way a ManagedService works. > > First the

RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
Do you mean it is really expected to get “$(PARAM)” instead of the value coming from the configuration file? JP [@@ OPEN @@] De : Achim Nierbeck [mailto:bcanh...@googlemail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2015 14:22 À : user@karaf.apache.org Objet : Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior

Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote: Do you mean it is really expected to get “$(PARAM)” instead of the value coming from the configuration file? JP [@@ OPEN @@] *De :*Achim Nierbeck [mailto:bcanh...@googlemail.com] *Envoyé :* jeudi 26 novembre 2015 14:22 *À :* user@karaf.apache.org *Objet :* Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpecte

RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
, no issue. Regards, JP [@@ OPEN @@] -Message d'origine- De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2015 14:40 À : user@karaf.apache.org Objet : Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup No, we mean that the "restart" (actua

RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup

2015-11-26 Thread CLEMENT Jean-Philippe
EMENT Jean-Philippe [mailto:jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com] Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2015 14:45 À : user@karaf.apache.org Objet : RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup The default one (eager). This behavior may happen only during the very first Karaf execution when the u