Oddly I can no longer reproduce the issue.
I thought it might have gone away because I'd added:
scr
into my feature in the features.xml file. However I take that out again and it
still works. Odd.
If I encounter it again, I'll reduce to a simple test case.
> On 14 June 2017 at 09:45
> I propose to share the code and chat directly (on hangout/skype/private
> e-mail).
Any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated.
I have many issues that I'm trying to resolve, as you can tell.
Hi Tom,
I will take a look on your code.
You custom distribution needs the log feature providing slf4j packages, else
wrap will need the slf4j package.
Tom, it's really hard to follow how you define your feature/custom distribution.
I propose to share the code and chat directly (on
Hi David,
I think the reason is more that features in karaf used to work a lot
simpler in the start. They were simply a list of bundles to install. Over
time features got more and more abilities.
So it is less to lock in people and more simply a history matter.
Since karaf 4 features use the
And anyway, Karaf Features can leverage OBR (directly or via Cave).
Karaf can load OBR repos in org.apache.karaf.features.cfg and use it directly.
Regards
JB
On 06/14/2017 06:46 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi David,
I think the reason is more that features in karaf used to work a lot
For sure, to validate your feature, it has to define scr as inner or dependency
feature.
Regards
JB
On 06/14/2017 02:44 PM, t...@quarendon.net wrote:
Oddly I can no longer reproduce the issue.
I thought it might have gone away because I'd added:
scr
into my feature in the features.xml
Thank you JB and Christian,
I think that about answers my question. Right now I don’t have time to actually
invest in doing anything about it, but I was just curious. :-)
Cheers,
=David
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 1:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> And anyway, Karaf
When we say "OBR" are we referring to the OSGi Subsystem spec?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:49 AM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf Feature vs. OBR
And anyway, Karaf Features can leverage OBR
No, the OSGi Repository spec.
Regards
JB
On 06/14/2017 08:43 PM, Leschke, Scott wrote:
When we say "OBR" are we referring to the OSGi Subsystem spec?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:49 AM
To:
I just did a Google search for apache cave nexus to see if anybody provided a
comparison, and this is what I found:
> Can you share your sample project ?
I will try to put together a simple standalone test case. In fact I'll do that
for something else as well that I can't get past.
I'm trying to build a custom karaf distribution using the maven karaf-assembly
packaging type.
My latest issue is that the build fails with
missing requirement osgi.extender;
filter:="(&(osgi.extender=osgi.component)(version>=1.3.0)(!(version>=2.0.0)))"
I interpret this as meaning the bundle
Hi Tom,
also, how does your bnd "project" look like,
my gut feeling tells me right now, it might be because of duplicate bundles
installed via std. Karaf and bnd-tools,
may this be an issue?
regards, Achim
2017-06-14 10:08 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Hi,
>
> Can you
I found this thread because of a similar need -- I store a configuration in
yaml format for a java application that I'm "OSGi-fying". The flat
dictionary isn't going to work for me, nor is the
`${karaf.etc}/worker-config.yaml` method going to work (it won't monitor the
worker-config.yaml for
Hi tom,
I know Karaf 4.1.1 and Hibernate works, though I don't have an OSS project
at hand to prove it.
I might sound a bit grumpy, but my gut feeling tells me the root to your
issues are those bndtools generated bundles.
I fear sometimes they do provide to much "included" when run in a Karaf
So if you consider an OBR as being a collection of resources, each resource
having capabilities and requirements, then a feature repository is an OBR
repository, it's just the syntax is more concise.
If you want to look at what the repository look like, you can launch the
following command in
That would be great.
In the mean time, I'm testing with the karaf-samples I prepared for the dev
guide update.
Regards
JB
On 06/14/2017 10:24 AM, t...@quarendon.net wrote:
Can you share your sample project ?
I will try to put together a simple standalone test case. In fact I'll do that
I have put together a simple example of the problem I'm been encountering
attempting to create a custom karaf distribution.
If you attempt to include a bundle such as
org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.http.servlet-api in a feature, you get this
build error:
missing requirement
18 matches
Mail list logo