Re: pax-jdbc-dbcp2 and connection pooling

2016-11-28 Thread dpravin
Hi Achim, Here is link to the pull request. https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jdbc/pull/29 Thanks, Pravin -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/pax-jdbc-dbcp2-and-connection-pooling-tp4048791p4048851.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
You can use the append attribute on feature config. However, it won't override, it's only append. And it's the expected behavior as if an user changes the properties, we don't want to override the "custom" values. Regards JB On 11/28/2016 05:11 PM, Tim Ward wrote: OK, nearly there, thanks

Re: Could/should OsgiConfiguration for JAAS fallback to default configuration

2016-11-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks Sergiy, I will review. Regards JB On 11/28/2016 03:03 PM, Sergiy Shyrkov wrote: Hello guys, we've finally tested the fix successfully on our side and have submitted it as a pull request: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/271 Thank you! Kind regards Sergiy On Thu, 20 Oct 2016

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Actually, feature now populate the etc folder as well (since Karaf 4.0.5 AFAIR). Regards JB On 11/28/2016 02:50 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: You already found the confiFile option for features. This is the most widely used option. The alternative is the config option which simply adds the

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi Tim, as Christian already stated, you have two different ways of configuring. 1) inisde the feature itself as element 2) as external location, for example an URI to a resource located in a Maven Repository. But here you can reference any valid URI pattern where a corresponding URI handler is

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Guillaume Nodet
2016-11-28 14:50 GMT+01:00 Christian Schneider : > You already found the confiFile option for features. This is the most > widely used option. > The alternative is the config option which simply adds the config in > config admin but not in etc. > Fwiw, both should add

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Tim Ward
On 28/11/2016 15:14, Christian Schneider wrote: On 28.11.2016 15:14, Tim Ward wrote: Thanks - replies inline: On 28/11/2016 13:50, Christian Schneider wrote: You already found the confiFile option for features. This is the most widely used option. So what is the "URL" in the element, and

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Christian Schneider
On 28.11.2016 15:14, Tim Ward wrote: Thanks - replies inline: On 28/11/2016 13:50, Christian Schneider wrote: You already found the confiFile option for features. This is the most widely used option. So what is the "URL" in the element, and how do my config files get there from git? The

Re: Configuration file handling?

2016-11-28 Thread Tim Ward
Thanks - replies inline: On 28/11/2016 13:50, Christian Schneider wrote: You already found the confiFile option for features. This is the most widely used option. So what is the "URL" in the element, and how do my config files get there from git? The alternative is the config option which

Re: Could/should OsgiConfiguration for JAAS fallback to default configuration

2016-11-28 Thread Sergiy Shyrkov
Hello guys, we've finally tested the fix successfully on our side and have submitted it as a pull request: https://github.com/apache/karaf/pull/271 Thank you! Kind regards Sergiy On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:59:03 +0200, Benjamin Papez wrote: Hi JB, thanks for