Good point for undertow ;)
Thanks Achim !
Regards
JB
On 01/30/2017 03:05 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
Hi,
actually you have the choice between three containers by now.
That is Jetty - default
Tomcat - do not use in production
and Undertow - not sure if it's safe to use in production
regards,
Hi,
actually you have the choice between three containers by now.
That is Jetty - default
Tomcat - do not use in production
and Undertow - not sure if it's safe to use in production
regards, Achim
2017-01-30 14:24 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Hi Svetlin,
>
> Karaf
Hi Svetlin,
Karaf wraps Pax Web. Pax Web 6.x ships Jetty (default for a while), but
you now also have the choice between jetty and tomcat: it's two
different features, both providing the same capability.
Regards
JB
On 01/30/2017 02:17 PM, Zarev, Svetlin wrote:
Hello,
In the karaf web
,
Paul Spencer
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Migrate-1-war-with-3-instance-from-Tomcat-to-Karaf-tp4034828p4034833.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Apache Member
Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC
Karaf 2.3.5+
I have a web based application running on Tomcat that I would like to migrate
to Karaf. There are three instances of the application installed on one Tomcat
server with each instance sharing a common war but configured in its own
context. As shown below, The Parameter and
,
Paul Spencer
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Migrate-1-war-with-3-instance-from-Tomcat-to-Karaf-tp4034828p4034833.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jetty has a long history of being lightweight and easily embeddable,
with a good and responsive community, that's why it was chosen to be
used in pax-web, and pax-web was really the only available solution at
some point hence we have chosen it for Karaf.
I don't really see any major problems