Hello neo4j-ers,
I have question - when 2 threads (in embedded neo4j mode) want to concurrently
create the following RELs A and B (each within their own transaction, nodes N1,
N2 and N3 existed before):
Thread 1 - tx1 - N1--RELA--N2
Thread 2 - tx2 - N1--RELB--N3
does the node N1 represent
,
making data-local traversals without index lookups possible. This means
both nodes will be locked during the TX1 .
HTH
/Peter
On Tuesday, January 10, 2012, Josef Holy josef.h...@gmail.com
(mailto:josef.h...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello neo4j-ers,
I have question - when 2
Hi all,
has someone on this list any practical experience with using Gremlin for
traversing the EmbeddedGraphDatabase in a production environment? What
interests me is how it performs compared to the traversal algorithms written
directly against Neo4j APIs (using Traverser,
+1 against over engineering and for fulfilling concrete scenarios
One can definitely implement cool and 'function-rich' tagging systems
satisfying 99% of the usual use cases by using pretty much any db - RDBMS,
GraphDBs or even KV store. I have just learned from others in the past, that
Hi,
few notes from the top of my head on how we modeled this in the past:
User is a Node
Resource (Document) is a Node
Tag is a Node (having a label, language property, can be connected via
relationships to other Tag Nodes representing its synonyms, can become a
concept in (tree-)structured
5 matches
Mail list logo