/1454298
Would that help keep things clean?
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3574631.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
.
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3572548.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
NOTICE
Yes,
I agree. Basically, with Cypher for declarative and optimizable
queries, and Gremlin/Groovy for the power user or fine-tuned
traversals, the REST API could possibly be very minimalistic. Just my
2c.
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone
just YAML.
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3572548.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3572589.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST
-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3572589.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST IS BEING SWITCHED TO GOOGLE GROUPS, please
to look up the actual index:
index = manager.forNodes('people')
Here is what the Gremlin extension actually sees:
https://gist.github.com/1452942
Do see an issue with that?
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after
/1452942
Do see an issue with that?
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3573842.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 10/12/2011, at 9:03, Michael Hunger michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
For the first issue we have a work-around in the plugin which recreates the
script-engine every 500 requests (should probably be configurable) but this
is less than optimal.
That is just rediculous workaround
?
Last week when I emailed you, you were looking into a way to store a custom,
server-side Gremlin library. Would that help?
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3574372.html
Sent from
Because they are internal to the groovy script engine?
And can't be garbage collected as it is still around and holds handles to those
classes.
Believe me I would love if there was another way.
Cheers
Michael
Am 09.12.2011 um 23:53 schrieb Dmytrii Nagirniak:
On 10/12/2011, at 9:03,
On 10/12/2011, at 10:12 AM, Michael Hunger wrote:
And can't be garbage collected as it is still around and holds handles to
those classes.
Believe me I would love if there was another way.
It should really be addressed properly.
It just sounds like it's too hard, so we we'll just restart
://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3574507.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST IS BEING SWITCHED TO GOOGLE GROUPS, please
this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation-tp3569774p3574507.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST IS BEING
Michael -
What if each Gremlin script was scoped inside a Groovy function?
Example: https://gist.github.com/1454298
Would that help keep things clean?
- James
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Feedback-after-evaluation
Hi Guys,
Just want to quickly give some feedback on the neo4j after some evaluation.
Overall, I like the neo4j a lot, but have decided not to use it.
Probably the primary reason is the tooling around Ruby. Don't get me wrong. The
neo4j.rb is just amazing. It really is.
I even contributed
Hi
Thanks for your great feedback !
The tooling support for JRuby has worked well for me and would
probably still use JRuby even if there was a good native MRI neo4j
wrapper.
But I have a java background and might not be spoiled with that
instant feedback loop of doing behaviour driven
Isn't there something like the background jvm thingy that exists for groovy,
scala and other languages? A server that the current process connects to, sends
code over and runs it in the JVM?
What happens if your run the 1400 rpec tests several times?
Perhaps we should ask Charles Nutter for
Yes there is - nailgun.
Charles has already been involved in many of the problems that Dmytrii
had with JRuby.
For a good summery of Dmytrii's problem, check his twitter feed.
For RSpec JRuby performance and Charles response, see
https://gist.github.com/1423288
/Andreas
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at
Is HTTP as a protocol the problem? Maybe, it does have some advantages
though.
I think we all agree the REST API is not finished yet.
We talked last week about Batch operations as a poor-man's replacement for
Transactions and the concerns that brought up.
I think the REST API will get there
On 09/12/2011, at 8:15 AM, Andreas Ronge wrote:
Yes there is - nailgun.
Charles has already been involved in many of the problems that Dmytrii
had with JRuby.
For a good summery of Dmytrii's problem, check his twitter feed.
For RSpec JRuby performance and Charles response, see
On 09/12/2011, at 7:43 AM, Michael Hunger wrote:
What happens if your run the 1400 rpec tests several times?
I don't get the point of running it several times. I need to run one/couple of
spec as soon as possible and see the feedback.
Which older gems were problematic for you?
It's not
On 09/12/2011, at 9:22 AM, Max De Marzi Jr. wrote:
Is HTTP as a protocol the problem? Maybe, it does have some advantages though.
Yes. Definitely. There are always pros/cons for everything.
I think we all agree the REST API is not finished yet.
We talked last week about Batch operations
Hi Dmytrii,
I would like to point out that spork does actually work with JRuby. From
what I can see, guard and guard-spork are now supported with JRuby as well.
Please take a look at the supported platform list here:
https://github.com/guard/guard-spork and here:
https://github.com/guard/guard
On 09/12/2011, at 2:44 PM, Vivek Prahlad wrote:
I would like to point out that spork does actually work with JRuby. From
what I can see, guard and guard-spork are now supported with JRuby as well.
Obviously, it doesn't. I don't even get to guard. And of course not with neo4j.
This video shows
25 matches
Mail list logo
