This seems to be a bug in Lucene 3.1.0 and I can confirm that it doesn't
exist in 3.4.0, so I'm hoping neo4j will update the dependency soon.
2011/11/12 Mattias Persson
> It looks to be a bug. I ran the test case and while it's supposedly should
> work it doesn't... I'll try to look at it asap.
It looks to be a bug. I ran the test case and while it's supposedly should
work it doesn't... I'll try to look at it asap.
2011/11/8 ptashcka
> well, as I mentioned, node may still be found by text key/value pair, but
> not
> numeric
> also - the remove is not the problem, same issue if we just
well, as I mentioned, node may still be found by text key/value pair, but not
numeric
also - the remove is not the problem, same issue if we just add same node
with another key/value to the index
--
View this message in context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Numeric-inde
ptashcka [ptash...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 7:31 AM
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Numeric index update
Hi.
I have a problem with following test (perform it on an empty database).
First we add same node to the index with different keys and values. One of
them is numeric
Hi.
I have a problem with following test (perform it on an empty database).
First we add same node to the index with different keys and values. One of
them is numeric. After that - check that node may be found using these keys
and values. Then - update value for one of the keys and try to get node
5 matches
Mail list logo