Jim,
Can you tell me how to add my suggestions for a solution to this problem to
your issue tracker?
Niels
From: pd_aficion...@hotmail.com
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:33:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] partitioning the relationship store
The partitioning
Hi Niels,
The devteam backlog isn't public because it contains private customer
activities (as well as features from the community).
Andreas and Peter are working on a way that we can collaborate more effectively
with (the relatively small number of) community code contributors.
Until then,
At the risk of coming off as an utter bore, I would like once more to raise
awareness for the fact that the relationships of a node are currently stored as
one linked list. The downside of this has been discussed in many posts, so I
shan't rehash the points.
It's just that whatever I try to
Hi Niels,
Is this partitioning an aspect of the supernode problem? If so, there is a
feature request* in the devteam backlog for that.
Jim
* It is currently 5th in priority order.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
benefit depending on the approach
taken.
Niels
From: j...@neotechnology.com
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:40:21 +0100
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] partitioning the relationship store
Hi Niels,
Is this partitioning an aspect of the supernode problem? If so, there is a
feature
5 matches
Mail list logo
