Joshi,
yes, that is the plan - when the REST component is going 0.9, the new,
more generic index component will be used in there, too.
Thanks for the patience Joshi!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704
You can do that out of the box. If the result size is more than a certain
threshold (100, I think) it gathers the results lazily instead of in the
getNodes method itself. So if you do a query which has lots of hits you can
keep that IndexHits instance with you to do pagination and such with. So
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pierre Fouche pr.fou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a few questions about transactions and locking in Neo4j.
When I read the 'Isolation' section of the transaction wiki page
(http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions), I understand that Neo4j
provides
Hi Joseph,
The implementation of such a system would be highly dependent on your
architecture. But my gut feeling is that activity feed data is kind of
transient - it's not a big deal if it is lost. Its usage and access patterns
are also different from the data it originated from. That leads me
If you only need to
grab a write lock on a node or relationship you can invoke the
removeProperty method with a property key that does not exist.
Thanks for the trick, Johan. This way I don't even have to bother
releasing the lock.
--Pierre
___
Hi,
could someone please explain me when to use EXACT_CONFIG and when
FULLTEXT_CONFIG when using the nodeIndex() of the LuceneIndexProvider?
It seems to me that one cannot execute wildcard searches in
FULLTEXT_CONFIG mode, it only works when EXACT_CONFIG is used. But what
is actually exact
Oh yeah, that's right... you can control it via to_lower_case property in
the config. F.ex. you could do your own fulltext config like this:
MapString, String caseSensitiveFulltextConfig = new HashMapString,
String( FULLTEXT_CONFIG );
caseSensitiveFulltextConfig.put( to_lower_case, false
What are the next steps in moving towards getting the pathfinder GraphAlgo
REST APIs as part of the regular distribution?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Yep sounds like a better way to go instead of running a big Dijkstra. Maybe
an all Paths algorithm?
would monday be good to skype? I'm working on getting the site live,
I have configured nginx to redirect from port 80 to jetty on port 8080
I asked a question on Stack Overflow about the problem i'm
Changing this bit of code from my earlier example at least increments the
'count' property on the relationships. I keep a list of all the ones I've
created and check them each time I'm requested to create a new one.
It is probably not the most memory or processor efficient way to do it.
I'd
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your advise really appreciate it, Hope you had fun in North
Carolina :) I have forwarded this to the neo4j mailing list too,
hopefully get more opinions too, I have added my answers below, if anyone
has any input please reply too.
I will do a lot more research and testing to
Mike,
fatanstic you sort it out! Just send the CLA according to
http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/About_Contributor_License_Agreement and
Tobias or I can open a laboratory branch for you and then review and
merge over the changes to trunk. Would that be ok for you?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and
12 matches
Mail list logo