On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Jean-Pierre Bergamin
jpberga...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue for that: https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/141
I was bitten by IndexHits implementing Iterable myself yesterday, and
also agree that it's bad.
But it's not the only one. A quick search
Hi,
Yes, I have written an experimental JDBC driver that uses the REST API
to map JDBC calls to Cypher. It is available at:
http://github.com/rickardoberg/neo4j-jdbc
This can be used to access Neo4j data. Since Cypher does not yet
support updates this is read-only, but can be good for reporting
different
calls. So if you can let me know maybe I can test whichever you are
interested in, to see if it works. I am actually able to remote debug
the driver to see what is going on, so that is pretty simple.
regards, Rickard
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Rickard Öberg
rickard.ob
On 12/7/11 21:53 , Andres Taylor wrote:
A subset of the graphs are trees, and they have a few problems that are
specific for them. I'm right now planning what needs to be added to Cypher
to make it play nice with your tree structures.
I'd love to know if you have hierarchical data, and what
On 12/8/11 17:19 , Andres Taylor wrote:
I'm guessing something like this:
start ou=node(1234)
match (ou)-[:CHILD_OU*..100]-(child_ou)-[:OWNER]-(case)
where case.status = CLOSED
return avg(case.completionTime)
Question is, will the OU itself be included? Or does this imply that
there *has*
(the results are passed
into it), so if you want the raw IterableMap,Object, simply don't use
Projection. Support for JSON is a great idea though!
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Developer
Neo Technology
Twitter: @rickardoberg, Skype: rickardoberg
___
Neo4j
On 11/4/11 15:18 , Peter Neubauer wrote:
I like,
very cool Rickard! Is this in a doc-able state so we could add a test
for the manual in the Cypher section?
Well, the whole thing is very much subject to change, but it could still
be doc'ed to some extent.
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
to add to the basic
interface.
But are there other legitimate ways of transforming the result to
objects? Or is iterable(result,resultType) enough?
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Developer
Neo Technology
Twitter: @rickardoberg, Skype: rickardoberg
___
Neo4j
).to(y)
-
MATCH p=(x)-[r?:KNOWS*1..3]-(y)
So that's that! Have a look at the GitHub class above for more details.
I have also started integrating with QueryDSL for expressions and object
mapping. I'll post separately about that to make it easier to follow any
discussions.
/Rickard
--
Rickard
Maven dependencies you
need to use it.
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Developer
Neo Technology
Twitter: @rickardoberg, Skype: rickardoberg
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
are
common usecases?
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Developer
Neo Technology
Twitter: @rickardoberg, Skype: rickardoberg
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
)
And that's about it I think! Please have a look at it, and if you have
thoughts on the above, or any of the other design decisions, please let
me know.
regards, Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Developer
Neo Technology
Twitter: @rickardoberg, Skype: rickardoberg
12 matches
Mail list logo