Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
It also bugs me when I can't suggest any alternatives, yet don't like the ones in front of me... I became aware of a symbol a week or so ago, and it keeps coming back to me. The Enso. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ens%C5%8D Things I like about it: (all from wikipedia, since the only thing I

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
I didn't mean to veto- I thought we were on release rules. (at least three positives and more positives than negatives). If we're treating this as code modification (any -1 stops it dead) then I'm somewhere in the ball park of -.75. Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I haven't been active enough to feel good about an out and out -1. Put me as -0 On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. > > The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1 > > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
ok, the contest is cancelled On Apr 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Trevor Grant wrote: I'll revise to -1. Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent. None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth displacing blue man (dated though he may be,

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
I'll revise to -1. Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent. None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth displacing blue man (dated though he may be, has good recognition). ^^ Assuming it take 3 votes to pass either way? Trevor Grant Data Scientist

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1 On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed any spark (to me). I hate it when I can't suggest a

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed any spark (to me). I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negative feedback. But there it is. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Do you have constructive input

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is welcome input) or would you like to discontinue the contest. If the later, -1 now. On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. On Thu, Apr 27,

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth > paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations >

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations appreciated) but don’t want to unless people think it will lead to something. For me there are a couple I wouldn’t mind seeing on the web site or swag and yes

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
I thought we were just voting on continuing this process :) On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Grant wrote: > Also Pat, thank you for organizing. > > +0 > > I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to -1 > > Most of them remind me of

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
Also Pat, thank you for organizing. +0 I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to -1 Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Python, Numpy (a Python Library), or IBM's DSX. However, I realize a big part of that is the colors chosen. #143 is my favorite

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
+1 to continue; thanks for organizing this Pat! My personal favorite is #38 https://images-platform.99static.com/I9quDzcBrtJXg_NMaIsH6ySQ7Ok=/filters:quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/84/84017/attachment_84017937 I like the stylized and simple "M" and it reminds me of diagrams showing

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
We can treat this like a release vote, if anyone hates all these and doesn’t want to continue with shortlisted designers for 3 more days (the next step) vote -1 and say if your vote is binding (your are a PMC member) Otherwise all are welcome to rate everything on the polls below. In this case

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Here is a second group, hopefully picked to be unique.https://99designs.com/contests/poll/vl7xed We got a lot of responses, these 2 polls contain the best afaict. On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif We

New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif We asked for something “mathy” and asked for no elephant and rider. We have the rest of the week to tweak so leave comments about what you like or would like to change. We don’t have to pick one of these, so if you hate them all, make that known