Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1
On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed any spark (to me). I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negative feedback. But there it is. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is welcome input) or > would you like to discontinue the contest. If the later, -1 now. > > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > >> Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth >> paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations >> appreciated) but don’t want to unless people think it will lead to >> something. For me there are a couple I wouldn’t mind seeing on the web > site >> or swag and yes we do have time to try something completely different, > and >> the designers will be more willing since there is a guaranteed payout. >> >> >> On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I thought we were just voting on continuing this process :) >> >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Also Pat, thank you for organizing. >>> >>> +0 >>> >>> I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to > -1 >>> >>> Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Python, Numpy (a >> Python >>> Library), or IBM's DSX. However, I realize a big part of that is the >>> colors chosen. >>> >>> #143 is my favorite (possibly because it reminds me of none of the >> above). >>> But possibly if this goes to next round we can have them adjust hues / >>> colors. >>> >>> Trevor Grant >>> Data Scientist >>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo >>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo >>> http://trevorgrant.org >>> >>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Musselman < >>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to continue; thanks for organizing this Pat! >>>> >>>> My personal favorite is #38 >>>> https://images-platform.99static.com/I9quDzcBrtJXg_ >>> NMaIsH6ySQ7Ok=/filters: >>>> quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/84/84017/ >> attachment_84017937 >>>> >>>> I like the stylized and simple "M" and it reminds me of diagrams > showing >>>> vector multiplication. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We can treat this like a release vote, if anyone hates all these and >>>>> doesn’t want to continue with shortlisted designers for 3 more days >>> (the >>>>> next step) vote -1 and say if your vote is binding (your are a PMC >>>> member) >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise all are welcome to rate everything on the polls below. >>>>> >>>>> In this case you have 24 hours to vote >>>>> >>>>> Here’s my +1 to continue refining. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Here is a second group, hopefully picked to be unique. >>>>> https://99designs.com/contests/poll/vl7xed >>>>> >>>>> We got a lot of responses, these 2 polls contain the best afaict. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif >>>>> >>>>> We asked for something “mathy” and asked for no elephant and rider. We >>>>> have the rest of the week to tweak so leave comments about what you >>> like >>>> or >>>>> would like to change. >>>>> >>>>> We don’t have to pick one of these, so if you hate them all, make that >>>>> known too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
