Does a mesos task feature a URI attribute or list thereof? For downloading
data automatically within the sandbox in which the command will execute?
Eg. upon defining a task I wish to supply a list of
sources from which to download various different types of data all destined
for the container that
/acaee563a66e5528ae5c5e417f2a811f8ee466b2/include/mesos/mesos.proto#L618
.
If you want to check the slave attributes you can check the state.json on
the slave by looking at this endpoint: http://
host:port/slave(1)/state.json
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:00 AM, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com
wrote:
I think
Hi. I'm toying with the mesos scheduler (C++) API and running into
unexpected race conditions. I have *not* synchronised access to attributes
of my Scheduler-derived class. Is the mesos library code threaded and
network communication asynchronous? What it *looks like* I'm seeing is my
. Just so I know what
I need to protect access to ;)
Cheers,
Jim
On 9 June 2015 at 16:58, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I'm toying with the mesos scheduler (C++) API and running into
unexpected race conditions. I have *not* synchronised access to attributes
of my Scheduler-derived
method
must complete before the next is called.
So, we recommend that you don't block inside the callbacks. Otherwise,
you're blocking the driver as well and your own ability to continue
processing callbacks.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:58 AM, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I'm
!
Jim
On 10 June 2015 at 18:16, Steven Schlansker sschlans...@opentable.com
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:10 AM, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. When attempting to run my scheduler inside a docker container in
--net=bridge mode it never receives acknowledgement or a reply
Looks like I share the same symptoms as this 'marathon inside container'
problem;
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/marathon-framework/aFIlv-VnF58/discussion
I guess that sheds some light on the subject ;)
On 11 June 2015 at 09:43, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
For what exactly? I
someone will correct me where I'm wrong ;)
Cheers,
Jim
On 11 June 2015 at 10:00, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like I share the same symptoms as this 'marathon inside container'
problem;
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/marathon-framework/aFIlv-VnF58/discussion
I guess
Excellent. Thank you both for your time and efforts - and most importantly
clarifying behavior :)
Jim
complex async code base I manage.
I'll get back to you.
- alex
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:15 AM, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the responses, guys. That link of the 'detailed description'
will be handy - I've not come across that before. I do now have another
question
Hi. When attempting to run my scheduler inside a docker container in
--net=bridge mode it never receives acknowledgement or a reply to that
request. However, it works fine in --net=host mode. It does not listen on
any port as a service so does not expose any.
The scheduler receives the mesos
Hi Vinod - this is good news! Just the fact that I'm not barking up the
wrong tree and that indeed it is a known issue.
Cheers
Jim
On 11 June 2015 at 18:16, Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:00 AM, James Vanns jvanns@gmail.com wrote:
I think I can
s come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor
> must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the
> sender immediately.
>
> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 13:06, James Vanns wrote:
>
> I shall fix my own problem it's embarrassing.
I shall fix my own problem it's embarrassing. Top marks to those of you
that notice I supplied 3000 instead of 3 (which I understand is
actually the default anyway) to task_launch_timeout!
Jim
On 28 October 2015 at 10:21, James Vanns <jvanns@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all.
radgruchalski/
>
>
> *Confidentiality:*This communication is intended for the above-named
> person and may be confidential and/or legally privileged.
> If it has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor
> must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and i
Hi all. It appears there is a glaring omission in the 'Tasks' section of
the following doc;
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/monitoring/
Shouldn't there be a 'Tasks waiting' metric!? We generally have tasks
hanging around for
a while because their resource requests can't (yet) be met
you don't actually
> exit the executor process. Is this using CommandExecutor or a custom one?
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM James Vanns <jvanns@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Er, I could. At the moment it's pretty huge so maybe I'll just try and
>> trim it down a bit.
to switch frameworks suddenly - this was simpler because it was one
task instead of 100s.
Jim
On 24 November 2015 at 17:57, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you paste the logs?
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:16 AM, James Vanns <jvanns@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>&
Hello list.
We have an experimental framework (C++ API) based on Mesos 0.24 and we're
seeing duplicate task status messages -- eg. 2 'FINISHED' messages for a
single task. This may well be normal behaviour but I wasn't prepared for
it. Could someone point me in the direction of a decent
I think that’s all correct! The docs will be able to
> clarify better :-)
>
> On 18 Nov 2015, at 12:09, James Vanns <jvanns@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello list.
>
> We have an experimental framework (C++ API) based on Mesos 0.24 and we're
> seeing duplicate t
Hi again list.
Mesos 0.24
C++ Framework (still using the Protobufs based comms, not REST)
My framework appears to be holding onto offers (somehow) from tasks that
are finished!? I don't understand why. The task comprises of a shell
command that executes within a docker container.
The return code
Is the latency (perhaps the weighted rolling average) between master and a
slave measured? If so, is it recorded as an attribute of a slave object in
the scheduler API?
Cheers,
Jim
--
Senior Production Engineer
Industrial Light & Magic
22 matches
Mail list logo
