Hi,
Proposing to pay someone to provide a dummy's guide to add Ofbiz to Solaris
10 x86 SMF.
Thanks in advance,
Terence
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Proposing-to-pay-to-add-OFBiz-to-Solaris-10-SMF-x86-tp174p174.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list
see the link
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_receives
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-sold-to-Oracle-for-1-5-Billion-tp1749114p1749114.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
see this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day
On 2/04/2010, at 6:45 AM, bsreekanth wrote:
see the link
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_receives
--
View this message in context:
Le 02/04/2010 14:45, bsreekanth a écrit :
see the link
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_receives
must be an april's fools...
there would be much more noise in the community if this was true
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Le vendredi 02 avril 2010 à 04:45 -0800, bsreekanth a écrit :
see the link
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_receives
It's too late… we are april 2nd.
--
Matthieu BOLLOT
www.nereide.biz
I wish it is the same, and would check for an update in their blog.. If the
licensing is same, may be it is not bad with all those money and backing
from oracle. Let us see.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-sold-to-Oracle-for-1-5-Billion-tp1749114p1749155.html
Sent
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633
Soon patch will be uploaded with example data by Deepak Dixit.
Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Len Shein
Postgres team did its own with Larry too :D
== PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2010 ==
Following the trend towards NoSQL database management, the core team
has announced its intention to replace SQL with QUEL in 9.1, which
will be called PostgreQUEL. QUEL beat Erlang as a replacement
Thanks guys,
Much appreciated
Jacques
From: Rishi Solanki rishisolan...@gmail.com
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633
Soon patch will be uploaded with example data by Deepak Dixit.
Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
Done uploaded patch with example, I had added MINIMUM_ORDER_PRICE for
product Id: WG-5569 .
Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Website :- www.hotwaxmedia.com
Contact :- +91-98267-54548
Rishi Solanki wrote:
:-)
--
Ashish
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
see this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day
On 2/04/2010, at 6:45 AM, bsreekanth wrote:
see the link
Wouldn't it be better to add a minimumOrderQuantity field to ProductPrice in
the same way that SupplierProduct has?
Regards
Scott
On 2/04/2010, at 8:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
BTW Len,
Could you please test it. This would help me reviewing...
TIA
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux
Yeah, there was some discussing on the press mailing list about doing this.
The best part of the joke is the silly nature of it: why buy the cow when you
can get the milk for free? ;)
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
see this link:
+1
--
Ashish
Sent from my iPod
On 02-Apr-2010, at 8:27 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to add a minimumOrderQuantity field to
ProductPrice in the same way that SupplierProduct has?
Regards
Scott
On 2/04/2010, at 8:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This would mean that the minimum ordered quantity would depend on price and not the product itself. Why not, but I would have
thought it would have rather depended on the product. Have you an use case, or is it rather to open things? Because for the supplier
I see the reason, for the price less.
I agree with Jacques; IMO I think the minimum ordered quantity should not
have to be based on a price, why make the system to any calculations when
the requirement is solely based on the quantity entered. Is it possible to
add a new field (minimumOrderedQuantity) to the product and then have the
On 2/04/2010, at 10:56 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This would mean that the minimum ordered quantity would depend on price and
not the product itself.
Isn't this a good thing? Different ProductStores could have different minimum
quantity requirements.
Why not, but I would have thought it
Why can this be a promo since it could also change with dates
or
it could be based on the breakdown from receiving from a suppler and
different suppliers have different quantity per package.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier
Scott Gray wrote:
On 2/04/2010, at 10:56 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This would mean that the minimum ordered quantity would depend on price and not
the product itself.
Isn't this a good thing? Different ProductStores could have different minimum
quantity requirements.
I did not thought
Your IPOD is a year ahead.
:D
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
So that others cannot get the milk for free ;)
--
Divesh
David E Jones wrote:
Yeah, there was some discussing on the press mailing list about doing this.
The best part of the joke is the silly nature of it: why buy the cow when you
can get the milk for free? ;)
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at
Issue fixed.
--
Ashish
Sent from my iPod
On 02-Apr-2010, at 11:08 PM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
Your IPOD is a year ahead.
:D
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
Hi All,
I was just thinking out loud and I thought I’d post it to the community and
see what you guys thought.
Has the community ever considered and App Store type of approach to
customizations? What I mean by this is taking pieces\modules that you’ve
developed but not given back to the core
one opinion when discussed in other venues is that the continued support
of the module.
we have many in the special purpose the have not been keep up or tested
against the continued advancement of the trunk.
Maybe modules that have been tested and are for a particular release
then and update to a
Le 02/04/2010 20:13, ScottA a écrit :
Hi All,
I was just thinking out loud and I thought I’d post it to the community and
see what you guys thought.
Has the community ever considered and App Store type of approach to
customizations? What I mean by this is taking pieces\modules that you’ve
One problem I see BJ is that unless you are a technical user or developer,
how on earth would you know about them or what they do? Pur them in the seed
data on the demo and sell them!
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Question-about-add-ons-tp1749458p1749490.html
Sent from
A wiki that list providers of modules.
and let the providers have their own site and support.
since the modules would be in the hot-deploy it would be handles by
ofbiz one put in.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
Hi Scott:
I think this is an awesome idea. Would you be interested in
collaborating on something like this? We could start with documentation.
Regards,
Ruth
ScottA wrote:
One problem I see BJ is that unless you are a technical user or developer,
how on earth would you know about them or what
Not sure what I could do Ruth but certainly willing to give somethign a try
if people think its worthwhile. I wonder what the devs think?
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Question-about-add-ons-tp1749458p1749590.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at
Hi Scott:
ScottA wrote:
Not sure what I could do Ruth but certainly willing to give somethign a try
Do you have an add-on you'd like to sell? I have several pieces of
documentation (with a couple more coming online soon) that I consider
complementary add-on products to OFBiz. I'd like to
I like the idea of having a place for people to be able to download third party
software like many other projects have - but I'm still not sure how it would
work here. People have always been worried about compatibility between the
components and making it more difficult for people to actually
Yes, I agree. I don't know much about it, but it seems that so far Neogia
addons are the best answer to this kind of things.
For the licence issue, it seems to me that, even if the addons mechanism is Apache licenced, nothing prevent to have different
licences for addons
Jacques
From: Tim
Tim,
I would think that it would have to go through testing to be compatible to
each release and I'm not saying that it would have to be 100%. The releases
are not but if the committer was not willing to test on a periodic basis,
then it should be removed. I guess the question you are really
The compatibility is much less of a concern between the providers add-on and
the project - the problem will come early and often between two components -
that was what I was alluding to.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:22 PM, ScottA wrote:
Tim,
I would think that it would have to
Why not use the standard OFBiz components for add-ons?
The Neogia approach is based on a series of patches. They may think it sounds
like a good idea, but it's kind of like the DLL hell on Windows where you'd
have different add-ons changing the same code in OFBiz, or changing something
in the
:)
Thanks Regards
--
Pranay Pandey
HotWax Media | www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Divesh Dutta wrote:
So that others cannot get the milk for free ;)
--
Divesh
David E Jones wrote:
Yeah, there was some discussing on the press mailing list about
doing this.
The best part
I have added comment on the Jira better if we discuss on the issue so that
discussion History can be traceable. :)
Rishi Solanki
Manager, Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux
On 1/04/2010, at 10:02 AM, Len Shein wrote:
Can anyone please explain the usage of the following product fields:
quantityUomId
quantityIncluded
amountUomTypeId
I have been spinning around trying to figure out their usage for sometime
now and after reviewing the latest release on
38 matches
Mail list logo
