GMT-07:00 James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org:
Sounds like something else is going wrong. Can you adapt your test by
setting the MAX_FILESIZE very low for your table (so that it splits after 4
or 5 rows are added) and package it up as a unit test?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Yufan Liu yli
/language/index.html#alter_index
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Yufan Liu yli...@kent.edu wrote:
The query on test dataset is returning the expected result with the
patch. But on the original dataset (10million rows, 6 regions), it still
return the same unexpected result, I will dig more
The query on test dataset is returning the expected result with the patch.
But on the original dataset (10million rows, 6 regions), it still return
the same unexpected result, I will dig more into this. Thank you, James!
2015-07-02 9:58 GMT-07:00 Yufan Liu yli...@kent.edu:
Sure, let me have
I'm using 4.4.0-HBase-0.98
2015-07-01 22:31 GMT-07:00 James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org:
Yufan,
What version of Phoenix are you using?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yufan Liu yli...@kent.edu wrote:
When I made more tests, I find that this problem happens after table got
when possible. Make you use NULLS LAST
in your ORDER BY as rows are ordered with nulls first.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Yufan Liu yli...@kent.edu wrote:
I used the HBase reverse scan to find the last row on the index table. It
returned the expected result. I would like to know
), it returns 143024961.
Let know if you find anything. Thanks!
2015-07-01 11:27 GMT-07:00 James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org:
If you could put a complete test (including your DDL and upsert of data),
that would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Yufan Liu yli
in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and promptly destroy all electronic and printed
copies of this communication and any attachment.
*From:* Yufan Liu [mailto:yli...@kent.edu]
*Sent:* Friday, June 26, 2015 6:31 PM
*To:* user@phoenix.apache.org
*Subject:* Problem
weekend!
Mike
*From:* Yufan Liu [mailto:yli...@kent.edu]
*Sent:* Friday, June 26, 2015 7:19 PM
*To:* user@phoenix.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Problem in finding the largest value of an indexed column
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the advice, for the first one, it's CLIENT 67-CHUNK PARALLEL
Hi,
We have created a table (eg, t1), and a global index of one numeric column
of t1 (eg, timestamp). Now we want to find the largest value of timestamp,
we have tried two approaches:
1. select max(timestamp) from t1; This query takes forever to finish, so I
think it maybe doing a full table
Hi James,
I have tried the queries you guys are using above (select fact.c1 from
(select k as k1, col1 as c1 from t1) as fact), it works. But in the result
set, it displays the original column name (col1) instead of alias name
(c1). Is that expected behavior?
2015-06-16 13:39 GMT-07:00 James
10 matches
Mail list logo
