Yes, see https://phoenix.apache.org/secondary_indexing.html#Consistency_
Guarantees
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, Sumit Nigam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed that one of my secondary index was short of 2 entries
> compared to data table.
>
> AFAIK, the first update is
Hi,
I recently noticed that one of my secondary index was short of 2 entries
compared to data table.
AFAIK, the first update is always to index table. So, the only way an index
table could fall behind the main table is when the index was disabled by
phoenix. Maybe the region server hosting
Hi, We are using phoenix and hbase-indexer for our hbase cluster and we
have found a curious phenomenon about phoenix secondary indexes :
We put data (use psql to import csv data) into one table(C_PICRECORD) with
two global mutable index tables(C_PICRECORD_IDX1 and C_PICRECORD_IDX2) from
phoenix
I’m trying to get a database connection using the Phoenix JDBC driver in a
Groovy script.
I’m running into linkage errors. I assume its a conflict between the xerces
libraries
packaged in the phoenix-client.jar and those included in the JDK. Is there a
workaround for this?
Caught: