Re: Cloudera parcel update

[James Taylor]

This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would it
make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix
release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases.

Thanks,
James

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado  wrote:

> Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D skipTests=true"
> .
>
> And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target
>
> On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier"  wrote:
>
>> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation
>> about this?
>>
>> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado"  wrote:
>>
>>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work from
>>> chiastic-security.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2
>>>
>>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for
>>> parcel-generation in rhel6.
>>>
>>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats.
>>>
>>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I
>>> haven't looked further into them yet.
>>>
>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier"  wrote:
>>>
>>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this
>>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
>>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
>>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
>>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
>>> for the last version, but will require some efforts...
>>>
>>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier :
>>>
 Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
 apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight
 coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
 incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
 Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?

 [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P
 hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi
 ghlight/true#M378

 On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
 pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:

> I'll take care of it ;)
>
> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Flavio,
>>
>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about
>> their plan for further releases.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sergey
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
>>> release a newer version?
>>>
>>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Flavio
>>>
>>
>>



>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: Cloudera parcel update

[Pedro Boado]

Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D skipTests=true" .

And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target

On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier"  wrote:

> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation
> about this?
>
> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado"  wrote:
>
>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work from
>> chiastic-security.
>>
>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2
>>
>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for
>> parcel-generation in rhel6.
>>
>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats.
>>
>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I
>> haven't looked further into them yet.
>>
>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier"  wrote:
>>
>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this
>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera?
>>
>>
>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
>> for the last version, but will require some efforts...
>>
>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier :
>>
>>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
>>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight
>>> coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
>>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
>>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?
>>>
>>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P
>>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi
>>> ghlight/true#M378
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>
 I'll take care of it ;)

 On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" 
 wrote:

> Hi Flavio,
>
> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about
> their plan for further releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>
>> Hi to all,
>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
>> release a newer version?
>>
>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?
>>
>> Best,
>> Flavio
>>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Cloudera parcel update

[Flavio Pompermaier]

And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation
about this?

On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado"  wrote:

> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work from
> chiastic-security.
>
> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2
>
> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for
> parcel-generation in rhel6.
>
> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats.
>
> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I
> haven't looked further into them yet.
>
> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier"  wrote:
>
> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this
> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera?
>
>
> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" 
> wrote:
>
> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
> for the last version, but will require some efforts...
>
> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier :
>
>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight coupling
>> of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?
>>
>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P
>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi
>> ghlight/true#M378
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll take care of it ;)
>>>
>>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Flavio,

 It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about their
 plan for further releases.

 Thanks,
 Sergey

 On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
 pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:

> Hi to all,
> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
> release a newer version?
>
> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?
>
> Best,
> Flavio
>


>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: Cloudera parcel update

[Flavio Pompermaier]

I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this latest
parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera?

On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari"  wrote:

It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
for the last version, but will require some efforts...

2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier :

> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight coupling
> of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?
>
> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-
> Phoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/
> highlight/true#M378
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier  > wrote:
>
>> I'll take care of it ;)
>>
>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov"  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Flavio,
>>>
>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about their
>>> plan for further releases.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sergey
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>
 Hi to all,
 the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
 release a newer version?

 I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?

 Best,
 Flavio

>>>
>>>
>
>
>

Re: Cloudera parcel update

[Jean-Marc Spaggiari]

It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
for the last version, but will require some efforts...

2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier :

> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight coupling
> of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?
>
> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/
> Apache-Phoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/
> m-p/58729/highlight/true#M378
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier  > wrote:
>
>> I'll take care of it ;)
>>
>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov"  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Flavio,
>>>
>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about their
>>> plan for further releases.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sergey
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>
 Hi to all,
 the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
 release a newer version?

 I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?

 Best,
 Flavio

>>>
>>>
>
>
>