This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would it
make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix
release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases.

Thanks,
James

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D skipTests=true"
> .
>
> And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target
>
> On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>
>> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation
>> about this?
>>
>> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado" <pedro.bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work from
>>> chiastic-security.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2
>>>
>>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for
>>> parcel-generation in rhel6.
>>>
>>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats.
>>>
>>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I
>>> haven't looked further into them yet.
>>>
>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>
>>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this
>>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a
>>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable...
>>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it
>>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that
>>> for the last version, but will require some efforts...
>>>
>>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>:
>>>
>>>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official
>>>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight
>>>> coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API
>>>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes.
>>>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true?
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P
>>>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi
>>>> ghlight/true#M378
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll take care of it ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" <sergeysolda...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Flavio,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about
>>>>>> their plan for further releases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <
>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi to all,
>>>>>>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to
>>>>>>> release a newer version?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Flavio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to