Yes Erick, I did see your earlier post. And while I do agree that such a
wrapper would be nice, I just wish we could stay away from such extras.
I'm not interested in more clutter/dependencies. I'd like to have the
logging API natively support these things.
-chris
Thanks,
Christopher White
strings). It would be nice if things were more consistent.
-Chris
Thanks,
Christopher White
Sr. Programmer
1-617-772-2403
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ceki Gulcu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/24/2008 09:51 AM
Please respond to
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
To
User
,
Christopher White
Sr. Programmer
1-617-772-2403
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joern Huxhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/24/2008 10:24 AM
Please respond to
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
To
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
cc
Subject
Re: [slf4j-user] Java 5
Has there been any more discussion lately about updating the API to
support varargs and perhaps printf?
*** IMPORTANT
NOTE* The opinions expressed in this
message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
necessarily those of
