Hi,
Thank you for reply.
That topology doesn’t use reliable delivery
-> I thought I tested it with ack and backpressure function, but I will try
it again.
Try reducing the sleep time to something smaller like 5.
-> Thank you for advice.
Does "topology.max.spout.pending" help this situation?
In
Storm has support for a Redis-backed map state:
https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/external/storm-redis/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/redis/trident/state/RedisMapState.java
That topology doesn’t use reliable delivery, so there is nothing to throttle
that spout without the `sleep()`. So the spout will emit as fast as it can,
which is faster than the bolts in the topology can process them.
Try reducing the sleep time to something smaller like 5.
-Taylor
> On Oct
You can safely ignore that message, as it only relates to delivery of metrics
information (i.e. not topology data). It has since been set to a DEBUG level
message, but that change isn’t in an official release yet.
What it means is that the handler got more than one metrics message when it was
Thanks Arun. Does storm recommend any specific in-memory store for
persistence? I see memached given as an example in the storm documentation
but no word about other stores.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM Arun Mahadevan wrote:
>
>
> MemoryMapState is more for testing and does
MemoryMapState is more for testing and does not provide any persistence. It
uses a HashMap internally. If you want persistence you need use the one based
on redis or other.
Thanks,
Arun
From: Dinesh Babu K G
Reply-To: "user@storm.apache.org"
Hi all,
I would like to understand when to use MemoryMapState v/s using a state
that is based on a in-memory data store (like memcached, redis or
aerospike) while doing persistentAggregate() in Trident.
Are there any pros & cons between the two approaches?
Thanks,
Dinesh Babu K.G