00 US while Storm is free.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
>> > klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I found some interestin
>> then the 40k will likely pay for itself in needing to deploy a fraction
>>> of the resources for the same throughput.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:02:53AM -0400, John Welcher wrote:
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > Streams als
0,000 US while Storm is free.
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
> klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
>
> https://www.ibmdw.net/stre
lcher wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Streams also cost 40,000 US while Storm is free.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
>> > klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
In many cases storm performs well enough.
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:02 AM, John Welcher wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Streams also cost 40,000 US while Storm is free.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
>> klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
>>>
>>> https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/
>>>
>>> It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the Netty
>>> Performance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>
>>
>
Schaefersinho <
> > klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
> >
> > https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/
> >
> > It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the
> Netty
> > Performance.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Klaus
> >
> >
>
Hi
Streams also cost 40,000 US while Storm is free.
John
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
>
> https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22
n, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
> > klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
> >
> > https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apa
s free.
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho <
> klaus.schaef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
>>
>> https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/
>>
>> It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the Netty
>> Performance.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Klaus
>>
>
>
Hi,
I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm:
https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/
It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the Netty
Performance.
Cheers,
Klaus
10 matches
Mail list logo