--- ChristopherAngel wrote:
How do I call an action before going to that page?
This is untested, but AFAICT you should be able to
have the result be whatever type you want, so perhaps
you could send it to a type='action-redirect'?
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/exception-interceptor.html
Looks like you're right. I now have:
global-results
result name=Exception type=chainexception/result
/global-results
global-exception-mappings
exception-mapping exception=java.lang.Exception
result=Exception/
/global-exception-mappings
I am trying to use the Ajax autocompleter and would
like to pass some parameters. This is my JSP:
form id=selectForm
s:url id=autosports action=LookupSports
includeParams=all
s:param name=key value=SearchString/
s:param name=value value=yarr/
s:param name=context
I'm kind of stumped on this problem too, how can I send the original request
uri to the login action so that it knows what page to redirect to?
Jae K wrote:
Hello all, this is a struts2 question.
I'm trying to implement a feature where a custom AuthenticationInterceptor
would redirect
--- meeboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm kind of stumped on this problem too, how can I
send the original request uri to the login action so
that it knows what page to redirect to?
Which is the problem; getting the original request, or
sending data to the action?
Sending data to the action
You can use the formId attribute, like:
form id=dataForm
//fields here
/form
s:autocompleter formId=dataForm .. /
and it will pass the fields of the form as paramteers when the autocompleter
is loaded.
musachy
On 4/5/07, Scott Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to use the Ajax
Yeah Dave, the problem is passing the data. I have my Login.java action class
which implements ServletRequestAware but it'll of course only retrieve
localhost:8080/login.action since that's the request URI. I need to somehow
tell it which location the user tried to login from so that it can
Thanks Ted. Let us suppose for a moment there are no parameters passed with
the URL. Is there an S2 pulley or chain I can tug on to bypass the
validation? Maybe this is not a case where I should be using a S2 tag? It
strikes me as odd that a hyperlink not related to the form would be
I had the whole validation thing working great, and then I had to go and
get 'fancy' with my Actions and aliases, and now, I can't seem to get my
validator xml files named correctly...
!-- Use Case 01 --
action name=Account_* class=com.skip.action.AccountAction
method=list
--- meeboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah Dave, the problem is passing the data. I have
my Login.java action class which implements
ServletRequestAware but it'll of course only
retrieve
localhost:8080/login.action since that's the request
URI. I need to somehow tell it which location the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It strikes me as odd that a hyperlink not related to
the form would be intercepted by the form validator.
Meh; if an action is Validatable then it's
Validatable, you know?
I have to agree with Ted--if you're passing a
parameter that's being used by the method, why
--- Skip Hollowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had the whole validation thing working great, and
then I had to go and get 'fancy' with my Actions and
aliases,
That'll teach ya'!
AccountAction_payment-validation.xml doesn't work
AccountAction_Payment-validation.xml doesn't work
Are the
Gotcha Dave... now all I need is clean URL:s before I can actually consider
using this damned framework :)
Dave Newton-4 wrote:
--- meeboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah Dave, the problem is passing the data. I have
my Login.java action class which implements
ServletRequestAware but
--- meeboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gotcha Dave... now all I need is clean URL:s before
I can actually consider using this damned framework
Clean URLs?
FYI, the source for
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.ServletConfigInterceptor
shows how to access the request, from which you can
grab the
Thank you, Musachy! I did overlook that option, my
state parameter is passing great now.
I also figured out why the string I typed into the
autocomplete field had a value but no key: I forgot to
put name=team in the s:autocomplete tag. Once I did
that it worked fine.
Thanks again,
Scott
---
Dave Newton-4 wrote:
--- Skip Hollowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=postpost=9857845i=0
wrote:
AccountAction_payment-validation.xml doesn't work
AccountAction_Payment-validation.xml doesn't work
Are the underscores typos?
No typos. I am grasping at
--- Skip Hollowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Newton-4 wrote:
Skip Hollowell said:
AccountAction_payment-validation.xml doesn't work
AccountAction_Payment-validation.xml doesn't work
Are the underscores typos?
No typos.
So how can I turn on the validation for this form /
action /
Dave Newton-4 wrote:
--- Skip Hollowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=postpost=9858550i=0
wrote:
Dave Newton-4 wrote:
Skip Hollowell said:
AccountAction_payment-validation.xml doesn't work
AccountAction_Payment-validation.xml doesn't work
Are the
Maybe you missed the part about *not* passing a parameter with the link
url?
I am experimenting with a few ideas to minimize writing too many Action
classes by leveraging the wildcard method feature. This link allows an item
to be deleted and the parameter being passed is a read-only hibernate
How the link is generated isn't relevant. Once the response hits the
browser, everything is in HTML, and the framework is no longer
involved. When the client clicks the link, it sends back a GET for the
resource. If the action resource has been configured for validation,
then validation fires. By
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you missed the part about *not* passing a
parameter with the link url?
Maybe I was answering your *first* question?
This link allows an item to be deleted and the
parameter being passed is a read-only hibernate id
that was loaded into the page during the
Ted --
This is a great explanation! Can you add to this how Validator naming works
with respect to wildcard methods? For instance:
CourseAction
list()
create()
Course-validation.xml
and supposedly support for something like Course-create-validation.xml
I think I remember reading
Hi,
I have two jsp pages with different form bean.
on first jsp page, i have field called LastName. on first jsp page if user
press cancel the request. the user is navigated to second jsp page which has
also a field called lastName.
The problem is what ever value i enter on first jsp page
Hi guys,
I have this case now, and I'm not getting take the value of a map value
attribute.
Let me explain better. I have a class:
class Mov{ private String att; public String getAtt(){ return att; } }
and I put it inside a java.util.Map, like
Map test = new HashMap();
The WebWork bang notation for calling methods doesn't support
per-method validations.
However, the Struts-style wildcards do support per-method validations.
Validations can be specified just as if the method name had been
hardcoded in the configuration. The syntax is
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that it is the action name not the method name.
(Though, I often wonder if the method name would
make
more sense.)
Sakes alive, really?! Hmm, I wonder if I've just been
naming things luckily up 'til now--I may have to
rename some validation files,
You actually can do that with the default mapper, using wildcarding.
Here's an example of what we do :
action name=view/*
class=com.thestreet.cms.web.actions.story.ViewAction
param name=id{1}/param
/action
The only trick is that you have to remember to suffix your url appropriately
You actually can do that with the default mapper, using wildcarding.
Here's an example of what we do :
action name=view/*
class=com.thestreet.cms.web.actions.story.ViewAction
param name=id{1}/param
/action
The only trick is that you have to remember to suffix your url appropriately
You actually can do that with the default mapper, using wildcarding.
Here's an example of what we do :
action name=view/*
class=com.thestreet.cms.web.actions.story.ViewAction
param name=id{1}/param
/action
The only trick is that you have to remember to suffix your url appropriately
The second way, %{test['AnyString'].att} or even, explicitly,
%{test['AnyString'].getAtt()} should both work.
I know it might sound dumb, but is there a value to att? ( using that class
as an example, there's no way to set it :-)
-a
Felipe Rodrigues wrote:
Hi guys,
I have this case
Hi,
Does
s:iterator value=#request['email'] id=email
...
/s:iterator
not work for you?
Will Berger wrote:
How does one in struts 2 process a list of req parameters using ognl?
In jsp, this gets the job done.
%
String emailList[] = request.getParameterValues(email));
OK, I think I may be on to something here...
In this particular Action, I am working with a Payment class, instead of
individual fields. that may very well be where all of my trouble is.
s:form namespace=/irmc action=Payment_retrieveFee validate=true
s:textfield key=payment.amtToPay /
hi,
I've spent the last couple of weeks migrating our site from webwork 2 to struts
2. The Struts 2 version of the app worked fine on my windows machine, as well as
in our qc environment (apache/tomcat 5).
However, when we rolled the code to the production servers, we encountered a
rather major
Yeah, it's possible. Just declare both taglibs in your jsps, like this:
%@ taglib uri=http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core; prefix=c %
%@ taglib uri=http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/fmt; prefix=fmt %
%@ taglib uri=http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/sql; prefix=sql %
%@ taglib uri=/struts-tags prefix=s %
I have a link that calls an action and I would like
the action class to have some field values from my
page. Currently I do this:
s:url id=editUrl action=EditLineup
includeParams=all/
s:a href=%{editUrl}
onclick=this.href=rewriteLink(this.href)Edit
Lineup/s:a
In rewriteLink() I manually create
What problem are you having? Just do:
s:a theme=ajax formId=form .. /
like what you did for the autocompleter, there are a few examples on
showcase also.
musachy
On 4/5/07, Scott Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a link that calls an action and I would like
the action class to have
On 4/5/07 1:34 PM, Felipe Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%{test['AnyString'].att} prints nothing and finally
I've used this technique to access the properties of entities stored in a
Map. (http://www.vitarara.org/cms/node/81) Are you sure that the att
attribute has something in it?
Mark
Hello,
I would like to add a resource bundle to the path for validation
messages. The bundle must load from a path that does not follow the
Package hierarchy defined in struts2. The textProvider in the
ActionSupport class is private so I cannot directly add the bundle from
an Action class.
Ted --
I think the method name validation naming would be more intuitive.
Thanks,
Scott
On 4/5/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The WebWork bang notation for calling methods doesn't support
per-method validations.
However, the Struts-style wildcards do support per-method
Folks:
I have a form that is rendered by calling an action from a get or a put.
In edit mode, the fields are pre-populated from the POJO (param to get
the POJO is passed on the URL GET).
In create mode, the fields are, of course, empty.
The design issue I am having has to do with the
I have now done some more studies by making my own fileUploadInterceptor
class. It is complety the same as
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.FileUploadInterceptor, except that I
write in the log the class name of the HttpServletRequest I get in the
intercept method.
If I bypass apache as
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that it is the action name not the method name.
(Though, I often wonder if the method name would
make
more sense.)
Apparently I've just been lucky (and had fewer
method-specific validations than I thought :/ so far.
Having the validation files key
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:12 -0400, Musachy Barroso wrote:
oopsI had to upload a new one, overwriting the old one doesn't fix it:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/33168/quickstart_maven2.zip
musachy
On 4/4/07, Peter Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting
On 4/5/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turns out the annotations are class-based as well
(again, I had just been lucky so far)... If the
validation files were based off of method names the
annotations could be as well, which would be a nice,
unified view of things, IMO.
The validation
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The validation comes out of XWork, so we'd have to
file a ticket over there.
My guess is that it wouldn't be worth it; it's easy
enough to see the need for the existing way of doing
it and it's not *that* much more work. I guess. :/ If
anybody else chimes
Hello every one:
I am trying to write a little application to familiarize myself with
struts 2. I am trying to design the application using mvc2. the
application is nothing but a small utility for invoices. It store,
retrieves and update invoices. Each invoice belongs to an Account in the
DB.
Actually annotations do work at the method level.
On 4/5/07, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that it is the action name not the method name.
(Though, I often wonder if the method name would
make
more sense.)
Apparently I've just been lucky
Hi,
Our team is dealing with a technology decision and I was hoping to get
some advice. Some members would like to use JSF for the entire MVC, and
some would very much like the injection from Struts 2. We have decided
that the view will be JSF, but the controller is still up in the air.
This is
It sounds like that you might want to use the ModelDriven approach,
where the AccountManager is the model object.
I was surprised to find that there doesn't seem to be a page or FAQ
with regard to using ModelDriven.
Essentially, all you need to do is place a model property on a base
Action
I think you want the a tag having the ajax function like the autocompleter
tag.
You can just use ajax lib javascript like dojo to achieve it.
There is the snippet:
function dojoForm(form) {
var kw = {
mimetype: text/plain,
encoding:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually annotations do work at the method level.
That's what I thought too :/ I must be doing something
toopid, and I would have sworn I did this before (but
I already made one huge mis-assumption about my
validations); hopefully it'll be obvious to a fresh
set of
I think it is easier just to use the anchor tag from the ajax theme, which
already does this.
regards
musachy
On 4/5/07, joey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you want the a tag having the ajax function like the autocompleter
tag.
You can just use ajax lib javascript like dojo to achieve it.
From: Keith Easterbrook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Our team is dealing with a technology decision and I was hoping to get
some advice. Some members would like to use JSF for the entire MVC, and
some would very much like the injection from Struts 2. We have decided
that the view will be
Yes,your method is easier,I just missed your reply.
regards
joey
On 4/6/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is easier just to use the anchor tag from the ajax theme, which
already does this.
regards
musachy
On 4/5/07, joey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you want the a
I don't think you should turn on validation in edit mode or create mode.
Validation is only needed in save mode.
edit mode or create mode is just to show field data,no submit.
You can set validation only work for save mode like this:
Addinterceptor-ref name=crudStack
param
I have the following in the body:
@s.url id=foos value=foosList.action /
@s.form theme=ajax action=addTest method=add
@ s.autocompleterModel theme=ajax href=%{foos}
name=foo /
@s.submit value=OK action=addTest method=add/
@ s.submit value=Cancel
Yeah, I know.
I'll make some others test. I just aked to make discart a OGNL syntax error.
So if it is the correct form, so I need figure out what value is getting to
att.
And yes, My class has the setAtt method. Actually, this value comes from
database using boxSQL framework.
hum... I thought it could be the right way, because print nothing is better
than print it as a literal.
I'll debug a little more to find the error.
Thanks anyway.
Mark Menard wrote:
On 4/5/07 1:34 PM, Felipe Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%{test['AnyString'].att} prints nothing and
So, in the link you sent me, I found this:
myEntitiesMap['%{id}'].value
It is used to change the value of some Entitie inside the Map.
How to put some entitie inside the Map using OGNL?
One more question.Where could I found out when to use %{} or #?
Thanks,
Felipe
Mark Menard wrote:
On
Has anyone ever compared or iterated a Java 5 enum in JSP? I want do
the following:
c:if test=${obj.enumProperty == enum}
I don't mind comparing ordinals too, but I must be able to do a comparison.
Thanks!
Paul
-
To
hello,
i have a FreeMarker template which looks like this:
@s.url id=viewurl includeParams=none action=view
title=title.text /
a href=${viewurl}View/a
as long as title.text contains simple text, this works fine: it
outputs a href=.../view.action?title=whatever. however, if the
literal
I found the answer. The Apache JSTL implementation automatically coerces
the r-value to an enum. So the below example works as wanted.
Paul Benedict wrote:
Has anyone ever compared or iterated a Java 5 enum in JSP? I want do
the following:
c:if test=${obj.enumProperty == enum}
I don't mind
Add struts.properties next to struts.xml and add global resources like
struts.custom.i18n.resources=com.xyz.MyResourceBundle,com.xyz.props
also see here for more details
http://struts.apache.org/2.0.6/docs/how-do-i-set-a-global-resource-bundle.html
Best,
Aram
On 4/6/07, Love, Andrew [EMAIL
As Ted wrote those methods should return Strings which will determine the
result to be shown.
String myCustomMethod() {
if(1)
return result1;
else return result2;
}
action name=sample method=myCustomMethod
result name=result1/pages/course1.jsp/result
result
64 matches
Mail list logo
