n the page context otherwise.
And I guess that answers the question.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- doktora v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...] my jsp contains a <%@ page session="false" %> directive,
> > [...
I've just discovered that if in struts-config.xml my action specifies
request="session" (or does not specify a request in which case the default
is session), and my jsp contains a <%@ page session="false" %> directive,
the JSP does not see any of the form beans.
There is no warning and no messages,
Zero-config will be quite some fun if we had some more annotations.
Are there any plans on adding Interceptor and onther annotations?
All we have now is org.apache.struts2.config.Result.
-- doktora
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zero-config-and-annotations-tf3481752
compatibility, migrating from
S1->S2 will be a nightmare, if Tiles are involved.
I also suspect that calling S2 actions from S1 would have to be hard-wired
with , as opposed to using html:link. Is that so?
doktora
Ray Clough wrote:
>
> It definitely IS possible to comingle a S1 app
ut the struts.xml under the classes
> folder. The "boostrap" struts.xml can then load whatever other
> struts.xml's you would like using the include element.
>
> HTH, Ted
> <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>
>
>
> On 3/27/07, doktora <[
Why is it that putting this in the FilterDispatcher section in
web.xml breaks Sturts2:
config
/WEB-INF/struts.xml
It looks to me as if this makes S2 confused about the whereabouts of its
other struts-default.xml, etc. files.
doktora
Ted Husted-4 wrote:
>
> Put
I just wanted to inform anyone out there that may be thinking of migrating to
Struts2 in a gradual way -- by having both S1 and S2 in the same war -- do
not try this at home, if you are using Tiles.
It is a futile excercise which cost me 24 man-hours.
The best approach would be to do a complete
7 matches
Mail list logo
