> By clicking the link will display respective page that was developed
with JSF Facelets technology.
> I am facing problem in integrating struts with JSF.
>
> Could anyone let me know step by step procedure for integrating Struts
1.1
> with JSF 2.0?
You don't say what your
Hi,
Right now, I have struts application that is running fine. Now I want to
introduce a new link in the same application. By clicking the link will
display respective page that was developed with JSF Facelets technology. I
am facing problem in integrating struts with JSF.
Could anyone let
opics ...)
with Facelets
Hi,
I am using the Dojo example that is described here :
http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/struts-2-spring-2-jpa-ajax.html
It works fine.
But if I integrate the 2 JSPs (index.jsp and list.jsp) in a Tiles template then
it fails :
The JSP index.jsp becomes involved in some so
Hi,
I am using the Dojo example that is described here :
http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/struts-2-spring-2-jpa-ajax.html
It works fine.
But if I integrate the 2 JSPs (index.jsp and list.jsp) in a Tiles
template then it fails :
The JSP index.jsp becomes involved in some sort of infinite loop,
mraible wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help. I was able to get it working with Sun's RI +
> Facelets. I'm confident I could get it working with MyFaces 1.2 as well -
> but since they require a JSP 2.1 container (Sun's RI doesn't), I'll stick
> with the R
Thanks for your help. I was able to get it working with Sun's RI + Facelets.
I'm confident I could get it working with MyFaces 1.2 as well - but since
they require a JSP 2.1 container (Sun's RI doesn't), I'll stick with the RI.
Here's the two ways I discovered:
1.
mraible wrote:
I'm trying to integrate JSF into a Struts 2 prototype. AFAICT, I need to add
the struts-jsf-plugin to my pom.xml and add FacesServlet to my web.xml. Are
there any other steps needed?
I'm using Sun's RI since it run's on Tomcat 5.x with JSP 2.0. How do I tell
J
I'm trying to integrate JSF into a Struts 2 prototype. AFAICT, I need to add
the struts-jsf-plugin to my pom.xml and add FacesServlet to my web.xml. Are
there any other steps needed?
I'm using Sun's RI since it run's on Tomcat 5.x with JSP 2.0. How do I tell
JSF to use
Hi! was reding about the JSF built in support in S2 (jsfstack) and was
wondering if that also includes facelets? i dont whant to use the shale. Or
could one build a facelets interceptor ontop the jsfstack ? because Facelets
is so dam good :)
Thanks!
/Rikard
--
View this message in context
Hello everybody,
The documentation about JSF plugin in Struts2 is not long enough for me
to answer my question. So, could you please give your idea/opinion here?
My question is how we compare Struts2 + JSF + a layout thing (like
sitemesh) to JSF with Facelets. Is there any advantage using the
Thanks for the response (and for Clay!), Gary- this is exactly what I
needed. I'll have a look at the use cases.
Gary VanMatre wrote:
From: Rogers Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
So I hit the web and found Clay and Facelets (which being native JSF
technologies I assume woul
>From: Rogers Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
>
> So I hit the web and found Clay and Facelets (which being native JSF
> technologies I assume would knock out that last concern). I'm not
> asking anyone to tell me one's better than the other; rather
ed through Tiles).
So I hit the web and found Clay and Facelets (which being native JSF
technologies I assume would knock out that last concern). I'm not
asking anyone to tell me one's better than the other; rather, I've got a
specific use case I'd like to understand
you are
> > comfortable with JSF implementation (the Sun JSF RI
> > or the MyFaces runtime) would I recommend you try Facelets, Shale or
> both.
> >
> > Facelets and Shale bring extra functionality on top of a JSF
> > implementation that each project's authors felt
me) would I recommend you try Facelets, Shale or both.
>
> Facelets and Shale bring extra functionality on top of a JSF
> implementation that each project's authors felt were
> missing from JSF v1.1. Facelets brings a view definition tool, templating
> and tile-like functionality t
Since no one else has answered, I'll give this a try:
JSF is the base for everything you asked about. Only AFTER you are comfortable
with JSF implementation (the Sun JSF RI
or the MyFaces runtime) would I recommend you try Facelets, Shale or both.
Facelets and Shale bring extra function
Hello,
I am reading discussions about the above three frameworks with one goal in
mind, to find out whether JSF, Shale and Facelets are trully orthogonal.
That is, if I go along any path, will be able to add any other framework
lateron? How hard it is? What features of the frameworks are
dont have anything against
Facelets)
Rgds,
--Siva Jagadeesan
On 9/20/05, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Oh that is great !!!
> >I never knew we could do these things using Clay.
>
> It's a new feature that Sergey Smirnov requested. It's go
>Oh that is great !!!
>I never knew we could do these things using Clay.
It's a new feature that Sergey Smirnov requested. It's good to hear
feedback:-)
>But I have some questions about ur example,
>1) basename="com.acme.mywidgets" />
>I guess it is ur custom component.. What is baseName ? Co
ow what you guys think about
> Clay
> >and Facelets. One thing I liked about Facelets is it doesnt need any
> extra
> >xml file to define jsf components .
>
> This is also true for clay HTML templating (as of 09-19). For example:
>
>
>
>
>
> #{message
>Hi Guys:
>
>I am evaluvating Shale for upcoming project. I wanted to use HTML rather
>than JSP like Tapestry. I just want to know what you guys think about Clay
>and Facelets. One thing I liked about Facelets is it doesnt need any extra
>xml file to define jsf components .
Hi Guys:
I am evaluvating Shale for upcoming project. I wanted to use HTML rather
than JSP like Tapestry. I just want to know what you guys think about Clay
and Facelets. One thing I liked about Facelets is it doesnt need any extra
xml file to define jsf components .
Rgds,
--Siva Jagadeesan
22 matches
Mail list logo
