http://struts.apache.org/struts-taglib/tagreference-struts-html.html
(1)
This is hardly readable:
=== cut here ==
base Render an HTML Element Renders an HTML
element with an href attribute pointing to the absolute location of
the enclosing JSP page
=== cut here ==
* Escaped tag an
age-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:18 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: new website look
Wendy Smoak on 30/10/05 16:50, wrote:
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If someone has an itch to patch the stylesheets,
: right click, "Web Developer", "CSS", "Edit CSS"
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:18 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: new website look
Wendy Smoak on 30/10/05 16:
Wendy Smoak on 30/10/05 16:50, wrote:
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If someone has an itch to patch the stylesheets, that's great.
I added a 'theme' section to the website conversion Wiki Page:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWebsiteConversion
(at the bottom.)
There are links to
Wendy Smoak wrote:
(He also pointed out that Firefox was behaving correctly
wrt the column width, and IE was not.)
It's amazing how many times people say this in various situations, but
ironically what IE is doing is actually more "correct" in terms of how
things probably *should* work, but o
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If someone has an itch to patch the stylesheets, that's great.
I added a 'theme' section to the website conversion Wiki Page:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsWebsiteConversion
(at the bottom.)
There are links to the two relevant plugins, plus Michael
Ted Husted on 27/10/05 14:03, wrote:
On 10/26/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally I'm still in the Struts Classic camp at this point
in time, but thats because my day job has 4+ years worth of investment
in it and I havem't had time to evaluate the alternatives yet.
It
accepts a
user-hostile site
Not to say this site is user-hostile
Keep up the Good Work!
M
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: new website
On 10/26/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I'm still in the Struts Classic camp at this point
> in time, but thats because my day job has 4+ years worth of investment
> in it and I havem't had time to evaluate the alternatives yet.
It wouldn't surprise me to find that at
Just to keep things in perspective: The Struts site is not meant to be
business-to-consumer. We are geek-to-geek :)
The primary purpose of the site is to attract new committers to the
project. We don't care about anonymous downloads, or marketshare, or
any of that. We care about working together t
On 10/27/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two suggestions... first, Ted's change I believe should be under a News
> section, or something similar, not on the front page. People visiting
> the Struts site and likely going to (a) learn about and/or acquire
> Struts or (b) look for
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Frank, did Ted's changes resolve the problems you were seeing?
(Something involving Laurie's sidebar?)
Wasn't Laurie's sidebar in particular, just having any sidebar open in
FF. But yes, that issue looks to have been resolved by Ted's change.
Does anyone have any other m
On 10/26/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does that leave outstanding for the site, then? Michael, you've
> mentioned the background, and I think it can go in the custom theme
> stylesheet, if you want to suggest one.
> Does anyone have any other minor annoyances, things that hav
From: "Ted Husted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm uploading a new site home page with a section promoting
ApacheCon, but that leaves the image out of the sidebar. Should be
online within a couple of hours.
Very nice. Good thing, too, because my question about the m1 site plugin
got _no_ attention
Looks nice in Mozilla.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Oct 25, 2005 8:41 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: new website look
On 10/25/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to try Frank's suggestion
On 10/25/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to try Frank's suggestion to fix the left-hand column, but it
> sounds like Ted is going to move the logo elsewhere. (Thanks!) So I'll
> leave it alone and see what you come up with.
OK, I'm uploading a new site home page with a se
From: "Adam Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David wrote:
maven allows you to provide your own css for your projet.
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/using/site.html
Hey wow, can we have a kind of csszengarden competition with this?
Patches, including contributions to the website, are always welc
Wendy Smoak on 25/10/05 17:34, wrote:
From: "David Delbecq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wendy wrote:
As Frank mentioned, the site is generated by Maven, which means
we are not (and do not want to be) in control of the XSLT and
CSS that make it happen.
maven allows you to provide your own css for yo
On 10/25/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone would like to modify the existing stylesheet or come up with a
> new look for the site, we'll certainly consider it. :)
I think I'd like to try it as a section on the home page, rather than
on the menu bar. This would also give us ro
The problem only seems to manifest itself on Firefox with the sidebar
open... actually, you get a similar yet different problem in IE with the
sidebar open... In both, the nav column scrunches up right next to the
main content text, but the image doesn't overflow in IE. I think the text
scrunching
On 10/24/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you've mentioned. :) Except for the left-hand column resizing itself
> smaller than the ApacheCon logo, I don't see any major problems.
+1
It's important for people to realize that this is our one and only
website. We don't have a staging
From: "David Delbecq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wendy wrote:
As Frank mentioned, the site is generated by Maven, which means we are
not
(and do not want to be) in control of the XSLT and CSS that make it
happen.
maven allows you to provide your own css for your projet.
http://maven.apache.org/maven
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You chose the tool, it does not work 100% correctly,
should you choose another tool?
That's one option. Another option is working to get the tool fixed, which
in this case means researching the bug tickets for the Maven 1 'site' and
'xdoc' plugins
Michael Jouravlev a écrit :
>On 10/24/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Firefox 1.0.6 on W2K --> site is screwed up.
>>>
>>>
>>So you've mentioned. :) Except for the left-hand column resizing itself
>>smaller tha
On 10/24/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Firefox 1.0.6 on W2K --> site is screwed up.
>
> So you've mentioned. :) Except for the left-hand column resizing itself
> smaller than the ApacheCon logo, I don't see any major problems.
Yes
From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Firefox 1.0.6 on W2K --> site is screwed up.
So you've mentioned. :) Except for the left-hand column resizing itself
smaller than the ApacheCon logo, I don't see any major problems.
I know there are some broken links, and I'd like to get some red
Firefox 1.0.6 on W2K --> site is screwed up.
On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The rail problems also occur in Mozilla on my Red Hat 7.3 box. Other than
> that, the site looks good.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
+1 (LOL)
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: new website look
Naturally someone can and should correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
the site is generated via Maven
--
> From: Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Oct 23, 2005 5:21 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: new website look
>
> Left column is resizable with some weird width persentage. ApacheCon
> ad does not resize, and sticks out.
>
> Back
t you only have
tested with IE (that goes for anyone).
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Oct 23, 2005 5:21 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: new website look
Left column is resizable with some weird width persentage. Apach
work normally in my
IE6 but not in those other two.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham Reeds
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 2:50 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: new website look
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Left colu
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 2:50 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: new website look
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Left column is resizable with some weird width persentage. ApacheCon
> ad does not resize, and sticks out.
>
> Background is not set, too.
>
> On 10/22/05, Adam
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Left column is resizable with some weird width persentage. ApacheCon
ad does not resize, and sticks out.
Background is not set, too.
On 10/22/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
nice new fresh looking website. Is that the maven-generated one?
Can conf
Left column is resizable with some weird width persentage. ApacheCon
ad does not resize, and sticks out.
Background is not set, too.
On 10/22/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> nice new fresh looking website. Is that the maven-generated one?
-
From: "Adam Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nice new fresh looking website. Is that the maven-generated one?
Yes. :)
Are you guys using maven2 yet? It just went production-ready. ;)
Not yet... the m1 build for Struts Classic is working fine, so there's no
rush to switch. And while m2 is final
35 matches
Mail list logo
