On 11/16/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here is the my distributionManagement to include in the xwork-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
apache-site
scp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/struts
file://C:/Stru
dnesday, November 15, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Requirements(O/T as relates to build environment for Struts2)
> On 11/15/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I need to build Struts2 so when I go to Struts-2 folder and execute mvn (2nd
>> generatio
On 11/15/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to build Struts2 so when I go to Struts-2 folder and execute mvn (2nd
generation maven against pom.xml)
(I modified pom.xml to accomodate existing jars)
How?
so when I execute maven in folder where pom.xml is located
struts-2.0.0-
;
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Requirements
> The new mirrors work well
>
> Please let us allo know when your next book on Struts is published
> I very much enjoyed reading 'Struts in Action'
>
>
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" ; "Martin Gainty"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Requirements
> On 11/15/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Attempts to decompres
On 11/15/06, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attempts to decompress struts-2.0.1-all.zip produce
struts-2.0.1-all.zip is not valid archive ??
There must have been a glitch in the file transfer. I can guarantee
that it's been downloaded and decompressed many times by many people.
Are
usted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: [s2] Requirements
> On 11/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's on the Getting Started page now,
>>
>> * http://struts.
Cool. Thanks Ted!
On 11/15/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's on the Getting Started page now,
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/WW/home.html#Home-PlatformRequirements
>
> -T.
Better yet: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/index.html#Plat
On 11/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's on the Getting Started page now,
* http://struts.apache.org/WW/home.html#Home-PlatformRequirements
-T.
Better yet: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/index.html#Platform Requirements
-T.
--
It's on the Getting Started page now,
* http://struts.apache.org/WW/home.html#Home-PlatformRequirements
-T.
On 11/14/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not really.
I would have thought it would be spelled out somewhere a little more obvious
and with less technical detail, e.g.:
*"Ap
Not really.
I would have thought it would be spelled out somewhere a little more obvious
and with less technical detail, e.g.:
*"Apache Struts 2 is an elegant, extensible framework,* well suited for
creating enterprise-ready Java web applications. It extends and enhances
various technologies fro
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/10/06, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, I'm surprised the report doesn't already distinguish deps marked
'optional' in the POM. Would it be sufficient to prefix the description
of each dependency with something like '[Optional: required when using
feature X
On 11/10/06, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, I'm surprised the report doesn't already distinguish deps marked
'optional' in the POM. Would it be sufficient to prefix the description
of each dependency with something like '[Optional: required when using
feature X]'?
We don't contr
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, it should look better, but it still wouldn't split out optional
and required dependencies. For example, it shows Rife Continuations
as required but it is very much optional.
My guess is that it would require some work
On 11/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, it should look better, but it still wouldn't split out optional
and required dependencies. For example, it shows Rife Continuations
as required but it is very much optional.
My guess is that it would require some work in whichever Maven
Sure, it should look better, but it still wouldn't split out optional
and required dependencies. For example, it shows Rife Continuations
as required but it is very much optional.
Don
On 11/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm...
On 11/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm...that list is very deceptive as it doesn't break down which
dependencies are optional and which are required. Only a couple are
actually required, while the rest are either fully optional or only
required if a certain plugin is used. Any wa
Hmm...that list is very deceptive as it doesn't break down which
dependencies are optional and which are required. Only a couple are
actually required, while the rest are either fully optional or only
required if a certain plugin is used. Any way we could clean that up?
Don
On 11/10/06, Wendy
On 11/9/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there doco somewhere on the minimum requirements for S2?
Does this help?
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/dependencies.html
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
19 matches
Mail list logo
