Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Eddie Bush
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:57:02 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This piece of code and this discussion is CLEARLY not appropriate to > the WIKI and is CLEARLY appropriate right where it is. This is just > more committer hybris and puffery. There should be MORE CODE on the > list. Th

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Dakota Jack
I find this all very humorous. See within: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:03:33 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:29:05 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:36:14 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Hubert Rabago
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:03:33 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While posting code and stack traces where you're having a problem is > part of the purpose of a user list, posting code examples is not > really the main point of why were here. This particular posting was > on to

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:29:05 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:36:14 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I never thought I'd be saying this, but I agree with Jack. :) > > > Heh! Wonders never cease! Heck, even Craig agreed with me on

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Dakota Jack
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:36:14 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I never thought I'd be saying this, but I agree with Jack. :) Heh! Wonders never cease! Heck, even Craig agreed with me once. Don't be embarrassed! Step right up there and join the majority! LOL ;-) Jack -

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I never thought I'd be saying this, but I agree with Jack. :) I would say that starting a new thread along the lines of "Hey, look at this neat code I wrote" MIGHT be bad etiquette, and even then it's arguable. But Jack posted code within the context of a discussion that is specifically about c

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-21 Thread Dakota Jack
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:19:39 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leading by example is good, except when you give a poor example. It's > generally considered POOR ETIQUETTE to post code, stack traces, or > anything else that adds significant size to a message. Put it on a > site somew

Re: Filter for Expired Sessions

2005-01-20 Thread Eddie Bush
Leading by example is good, except when you give a poor example. It's generally considered POOR ETIQUETTE to post code, stack traces, or anything else that adds significant size to a message. Put it on a site somewhere and mention the URL to it in your post, or, if someone specifically requests i