c:import, c:param, etc. Actually did my last few projects using just that
and it worked fine, although I didn't do any real performance comparisons.
I suspect it's not adequate for some common usecases, but for all the stuff
I'm currently involved in, it's fine.
Dave
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:10
What do you mean? (jsp includes and things like that?)
2010/11/26 Dave Newton
> For lots of stuff I just use JSP's built-in mechanisms.
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara <
> maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I prefer SM. You should consider that both use different
For lots of stuff I just use JSP's built-in mechanisms.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara <
maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer SM. You should consider that both use different approaches:
> 1. tiles uses composition pattern.
> 2. SM decoration pattern instead.
>
> SM
I prefer SM. You should consider that both use different approaches:
1. tiles uses composition pattern.
2. SM decoration pattern instead.
SM needs to wrap every response, in order to decorate them, and after
sends output to browser. So if one of your goals is performance or
even you need to handle
I prefer tiles :)
Am 26.11.2010 um 08:55 schrieb webmeiker :
> Hi,
>
> Based on your experience, what do you consider the “best” technology for
> layout in Struts2?
>
> Do you recommend me Sitemesh, Tiles2 or what?
>
>
>
> (Personally, I think the latest should be the “best”, because it’s de
5 matches
Mail list logo
