Shale may purloin the name "Struts" but their is no Struts to Shale at
all. Mark G. may or may not harm Struts (I don't think people are so
stupid as to let that influence their career decisions actually) but
Shale will kill Struts utterly, if Shale, which is very unlikely,
should be chosen to sup
On 7/6/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Now there is talk of Struts in the future containing ActionCommands
> > > which can be substituted in place of Actions, a
On 7/6/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/6/2005 5:03 PM:
>
> > The action class
> > provides the event contract, while the action form does the dirty
> > work.
>
> Well in this case the struts-config file would provide the contract and
> you
On 7/6/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now there is talk of Struts in the future containing ActionCommands
> > which can be substituted in place of Actions, and strung together in a
> > chain, and presumably can perform View
Michael Jouravlev wrote the following on 7/6/2005 5:03 PM:
The action class
provides the event contract, while the action form does the dirty
work.
Well in this case the struts-config file would provide the contract and
you could simply use one ForwardAction for everything. You've
substitu
On 7/6/05, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pity the poor noob who asked the original question! Little did he
> suspect that he would spark off a dialog on advanced MVC design.
>
> This debate has come up before and for me, it is one of the weak points
> of struts - I remember a couple of
6 matches
Mail list logo