d and/or stupid posts.
>
> BAL
>
> >From: Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >CC: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: banned
> >Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:24:14 -0700
> >
> >On 7/6/0
t; Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 07/07/2005 12:52 PM
> Please respond to
> "Struts Users Mailing List"
>
>
> To
> Struts Users Mailing List
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: banned
>
>
>
>
>
>
> See Mark post stupid commen
I hope you didn't spend too much time composing this puerile gibberish.
-Dennis
Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/07/2005 12:52 PM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Re: banned
See Mark post stupid comment
and way more damaging to the struts
> community than any bigoted and/or stupid posts.
>
> BAL
>
> >From: Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Struts Users Mailing List
> >CC: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: banned
> >Dat
nyone they want. The email to MD dept of
elections is spiteful and childish and way more damaging to the struts
community than any bigoted and/or stupid posts.
BAL
From: Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List
CC: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj
: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 6, 2005 10:10 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: banned
I cc'd them on the message I sent to this list in a moment of madness at the
rubbish arriving in my inbox and which I now regret.
http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40st
Few mature individuals who are well-grounded in a spiritual sense have
any fear of what newcomers and troublemakers can do to reputation or
to effectiveness. Those who yell, those who take up space, those who
talk strange and even with evil in their hearts, those who are
burdened with mental twist
TECTED]>
Sent: Jul 6, 2005 10:10 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: banned
I cc'd them on the message I sent to this list in a moment of madness at the
rubbish arriving in my inbox and which I now regret.
http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg29119.html
Nia
On 7/6/05, Brian Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, this is shockingly lame. Like amazingly lame. To mess with someone's
> livlihood because you think they are an jerk is inexcusable.
>
Keep in mind that, if Mark indeed did get fired (he has *no*
credibility with me, so I don't believe anythin
emberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Subject: Re: banned
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 03:10:08 +0100
I cc'd them on the message I sent to this list in a moment of madness
at the
rubbish arriving in my inbox and which I now regret.
http://www.mail-archive.com/u
Wow, this is shockingly lame. Like amazingly lame. To mess with someone's
livlihood because you think they are an jerk is inexcusable.
BAL
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Subject: Re: banned
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 03:
gt;
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: banned
I am absolutely NOT kidding.
The point is NOT that I was using my government email address to
subscribe to a technical mail list. Nor is it that I was posting
irreverent nonsense. The poin
hive for the subject with
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in it and you can see for yourself
who did this. Watch what you say and where you say it from - you
could be next.
It looks like I have been banned from the list; Craig says he approves.
~mark
James Mitchell wrote:
> You are kid
13 matches
Mail list logo
