not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:43:54 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
@Chris - Those are definitely good points. I think that our first priorities
than intended
recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within
this transmission.
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:43:54 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
@Chris - Those are definitely good
. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within
this transmission.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:23:57 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
Sorry Martin, did Dave answer your question
this transmission.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:23:57 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
Sorry Martin, did Dave answer your question? Were you just wondering
about
the namespace parameter on the url tag
to any party other than intended
recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within
this transmission.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:23:57 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
Sorry Martin, did
2009 20:23:57 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: this is driving me nucking futs!
Sorry Martin, did Dave answer your question? Were you just wondering
about
the namespace parameter on the url tag or about the routes pattern in
general
within this transmission.
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:17:13 -0400
From: mgor...@shadowtv.biz
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: this is driving me nucking futs!
Musachy Barroso wrote:
That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
something about it I guess
mitch gorman wrote:
I AM AN INSTRUMENT OF CHANGE!!!
Hmm, when people say that about me they say I'm a tool.
I'm not *entirely* sure they're being complimentary ;)
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-futs%21-tp22463203p22479288.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-futs%21-tp22463203p22479288.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr
...@struts.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-futs%21-tp22463203p22479288.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-futs%21-tp22463203p22479288.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing
Martin Gainty wrote:
can you explain this routes a bit more..what is this another attribute or a
template?
i can see see action, params but namespace?
Yeah, so if the action is in another namespace you can refer to it.
if you look at the code the base class changes from
public class
endorse content contained within
this transmission.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:24:54 -0700
From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: this is driving me nucking futs!
Adding the action, namespace and params url constructing pieces to s:a
would
be cool
: this is driving me nucking futs!
Sorry Martin, did Dave answer your question? Were you just wondering about
the namespace parameter on the url tag or about the routes pattern in
general?
mgainty wrote:
can you explain this routes a bit more..what is this another attribute or
a template
okay, can anyone (musachy, david, martin, i'm looking in your
direction!) tell me how to do what i'm trying to do, here?
i've got a list of items i'm iterating over. for each item, i want
to have one or more links to actions, with parameterization from the
item's data. this means, using
mitch gorman wrote:
okay, can anyone (musachy, david, martin, i'm looking in your
direction!) tell me how to do what i'm trying to do, here?
i've got a list of items i'm iterating over. for each item, i want
to have one or more links to actions, with parameterization from the
item's
It seems like you are created a variable variable name... I am
assuming that there is a reason why you are using s:a / and wanting
to refer to the constructed URL by id, rather than just doing the
following -
a href=s:url namespace=/ action=linkAction
s:param name=count value=%{count} /
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
s:url id=myurl ..
s:a href=%{#myurl} ...
inside the iterator, that will make your life easier. Assuming the
code was just an example, and you *really* need to create a bunch of
URLs and then use them, you can do it like
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
s:url id=myurl ..
s:a href=%{#myurl} ...
this was the very first thing i attempted... it was the logical
first attempt. unfortunately, what i ended up with when i did that was
a set of
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
It seems like you are created a variable variable name... I am
assuming that there is a reason why you are using s:a / and wanting
to refer to the constructed URL by id, rather than just doing the
following -
a href=s:url namespace=/ action=linkAction
s:param
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
s:url id=myurl ..
s:a href=%{#myurl} ...
this was the very first thing i attempted... it was the logical
first
yeah, the for loop is just to illustrate the point. The #context
thingie will work in any version.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
s:url id=myurl ..
s:a
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
s:url id=myurl ..
s:a href=%{#myurl} ...
this was the very first thing i
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
thanks for your responses, wes!
No problem, next time, include me in your list of gurus and I'll be happy.
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Author - Struts 2 In Practice
Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery,
Musachy Barroso wrote:
yeah, the for loop is just to illustrate the point. The #context
thingie will work in any version
okay, well, as i just noted in my response to wes, i clearly
must've boneheaded something else when i tried it the first time,
because the simple, un-overthought
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
thanks for your responses, wes!
No problem, next time, include me in your list of gurus and I'll be happy
lol! you got it!
(i knew for sure i was probably inadvertently
I guess one question I would ask is why s:a doesn't have an action
paramter and allow nested s:param elements? That way there would be no
need to create any variables.
(*Chris*)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:56 PM, mitch gorman mgor...@shadowtv.biz wrote:
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11,
That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
something about it I guess.
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess one question I would ask is why s:a doesn't have an action
paramter and allow nested s:param elements?
Musachy Barroso wrote:
That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
something about it I guess.
I AM AN INSTRUMENT OF CHANGE!!!
;)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Musachy, I would refer to you as a cool dude if you did that.
jk
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
something about it I guess.
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chris Pratt
my list of annoyances:
1. iterator tag no having begin and end
2. a not able to build a url
3. validateAnnotatedMethodOnly in validation interceptor should be
true by default
first one is down, I gotta tackle the other 2.
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jim Kiley
32 matches
Mail list logo
