Re: Key violation

2016-06-29 Thread Jonas Israelsson
Hi Jonas, 1) Is the entryUUID as 'Uid Attribute' by design not supposed to work in syncope ? entryUUID should work in Syncope very well. Probably, the trouble that you have is in your mapping. I mean, if you are using the default 'Uid Attribute' you have to map it as remote key by speci

Re: Key violation

2016-06-28 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
ave hooked up a connector to my openldap >server. >>>>>> >>>>>> First sync, no problem all users are placed in the local storage. > >>>>>> Second sync however, even though the sync is marked as successful > >>>>>> I see f

Re: Key violation

2016-06-28 Thread Fabio Martelli
all users are placed in the local storage. Second sync however, even though the sync is marked as successful I see from the logs syncope are trying to reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key

Re: Key violation

2016-06-28 Thread Jonas Israelsson
sync however, even though the sync is marked as successful I see from the logs syncope are trying to reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key, mapped to the local username field. Can I create

Re: Key violation

2016-06-24 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
successful I see from the logs syncope are trying to reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key, mapped to the local username field. Can I create this behaviour by misconfiguration, or do we have a

Re: Key violation

2016-06-24 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key, mapped to the local username field. Can I create this behaviour by misconfiguration, or do we have a bug here ? It is quite common to fall into such

Re: Key violation

2016-06-24 Thread Jonas Israelsson
fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key, mapped to the local username field. Can I create this behaviour by misconfiguration, or do we have a bug here ? It is quite common to fall into such issues when configuring an LDAP resource

Re: Key violation

2016-06-22 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
oblem all users are placed in the local storage. Second sync however, even though the sync is marked as successful I see from the logs syncope are trying to reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remot

Key violation

2016-06-22 Thread Jonas Israelsson
nc is marked as successful I see from the logs syncope are trying to reinsert all entrys to the local storage and fail due to key violation. I have set the matching rule to update, and use the uid as remote key, mapped to the local username field. Can I create this behaviour by misconfiguratio