Young Koh wrote:
In general, there's nothing to limit how many packets get queued to
the interface queue - if something sends a million packets, that is
how many packets are queued to the interface. However, for TCP,
there
interesting. then, the UDP sending rate should be solely determined
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
Young Koh wrote:
when i measured UDP sending rate in the host machine, it was about
650Mbits/s. that means the throughput of data transfer from an
application to the kernel internal structure is only 650Mbits/s?
but, when i measured UDP sending rate with loopback
On Monday 07 March 2005 05:42, Steve Schmidtke wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
Hey, has anyone found the time to put together any patch to workaround the
security bug in uml_net?
Attached are two patches. The first one, uml_net-slip.diff, is the minimal
patch to apply to uml_net. The second
On Thursday 03 March 2005 13:47, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggestions?
FWIW, we have gone off using switch daemon entirely. We are using
simply preallocated tap devices, connected to bridges via normal Linux
bridging controls. Works cleaner and faster, more places to
On Monday 07 March 2005 19:28, Ryan Anderson wrote:
Make the deb-pkg build target understand the um arch and set up the
package and directory structure to match a mainline-Debian style
user-mode-linux package.
This is primarily so that it stops matching, exactly, the naming
convention used
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.
Signed-off-by: Amit Gud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Paolo
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 09:25, Gerd Knorr wrote:
-void register_winch(int fd, void *device_data)
+void register_winch(int fd, struct tty_struct *tty)
{
int pid, thread, thread_fd;
int count;
-void line_close(struct line *lines, struct tty_struct *tty)
+void
Blaisorblade wrote:
But an unpatched UML won't work with a newer uml_net binary (for SLIP usage
only and only for closing the interface, I mean), right?
Correct. I think uml_net would need to manage a database of who opened what
to do what you suggest.
I also looked at the versioning for
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 17:13, Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 02:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello everyone:
I am a new coder of embed linux app development .I use User Mode Linux
as host stimulator environment where our applications running .now I
have a big problem
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 19:53, Steve Schmidtke wrote:
Blaisorblade wrote:
But an unpatched UML won't work with a newer uml_net binary (for SLIP
usage only and only for closing the interface, I mean), right?
Correct. I think uml_net would need to manage a database of who opened
what to
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:24:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
In the archives there was also an announce for a separate project for UML
only
to implement suspending in a UML-specific way (it was meaningful, but I don't
remember about it, even because they wanted to run their own mainling
sure, allow me to check if everything looks fine (at least) to me...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:29:29 +0100, Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2005 21:56, Young Koh wrote:
Hi,
i was running an expriment to measure network throughput of UML.
physical machine A and B are
Whats the lasted skas patch for 2.6 kernel ?
Itamar Reis Peixoto
+55 (34) 3238 3845
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 22:39, Michael Richardson wrote:
I'm happy to deal with whatever.
More open CVS is a good idea.
I even have a gForge install at XXX if you want.
Removed the hostname just in case (I didn't now why you mailed me privately,
maybe you just forgot to CC the list).
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 22:59, itamar wrote:
Whats the lasted skas patch for 2.6 kernel ?
See my homepage (at the end of the signature). Use -V7 for now..., it's a good
release (or -V8-rc2 with the fixup if you need 2.6.11 host kernel, but it's
still a bit experimental).
--
Paolo Giarrusso,
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not convinced about the practicality of converting all static
initialisations to code-based initialisations though
This is the first one I recall seeing. All the other conversions were replacing
static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
This implements a hardware random number generator for UML which attaches
itself to the host's /dev/random.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.11/arch/um/Kconfig_char
===
---
Fix a typo in the hostfs setgid code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.11/arch/um/include/kern.h
===
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/arch/um/include/kern.h2005-03-08 20:13:55.0
-0500
+++
The init function called by gcc when gcov is enabled is __gcov_init or
__bb_init_func, depending on the gcc version. Anton is using 3.3.4 and
seeing __gcov_init. I'm using 3.3.2 and seeing __bb_init_func, so we need
to close that gap a bit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
From Bodo Stroesser, mostly:
Gets rid of all inclusions of {sys,linux,asm}/ptrace.h since their effects
and contents are somewhat distro- and architecture-dependent.
arch/um/sysdep/ptrace_user is now responsible for providing the system's
ptrace interfaces to UML.
As such, it is a purely
This patch merges now-identical page table walking and flushing code that
had been duplicated in skas and tt modes. The differences had been the
low-level address space updating operations, which are now abstracted away
in the respective do_ops functions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL
Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -197,13 +197,14 @@
{ .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(port-list),
.wait_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
.has_connection = 0,
- .sem =
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, linux-os wrote:
We need to retain the spin_lock_init(lock) because not all spin-locks
are allocated at compile-time. They might be allocated from kmalloc()
on startup, probably in a structure, along with other so-called
global data.
Not to worry my good man, it's not
24 matches
Mail list logo
