On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Yup, sometimes I wish we had strongly typed integers...
>
> Yeah :-] ...
But, a nanosecond later, I think about the insanity of bytes_to_page(),
foo_to_bar(), etc converters that would be needed...
> Ah, well, he's the reporter o
so instead of just my usual whining attached is a suggested fix ;)
D. Bahi wrote:
> i'm trying to build an 'uptodate' UML guest and see exactly this
> 'undefined reference to indirect_set_thread_area' (reported in November)
> with 2.6.15 and all the incrementals from the patch tarball for
> 2006-0
i'm trying to build an 'uptodate' UML guest and see exactly this
'undefined reference to indirect_set_thread_area' (reported in November)
with 2.6.15 and all the incrementals from the patch tarball for
2006-01-08 on user-mode-linux.sf.net.
the comment related to this patch says CONFIG_MODE_ TT 'of
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:21, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:39:59AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 15:14, wang lianwei wrote:
> > (What happened to these bad "*" guys ;-) ? )
> Yeah, this would have been better expressed as a patch.
> > > total_len
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:39:59AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 15:14, wang lianwei wrote:
> (What happened to these bad "*" guys ;-) ? )
Yeah, this would have been better expressed as a patch.
> > total_len = phys_len + iomem_len + highmem_len;
>
> Remember people: nev
