On Wednesday 20 April 2005 03:51, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > Comments inline
> > Also, tried compiling UML itself on a real 32-bit box (with static
> > linking, obviously)?
>
> Yes - work.
What I really meant was whether that UML, compiled on that environemnt, works
in that situation - however this
> Comments inline
> >
> > On 15/04/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > > > Hi there,
>
> > > > The problem is that my bootup dies very early on and this is the total
> > > > output: Checking for /proc/mm...not found
> > > > Che
On Friday 15 April 2005 06:56, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Comments inline
>
> On 15/04/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > The problem is that my bootup dies very early on and this is the total
> > > output: Checking
On Friday 15 April 2005 08:42, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Blaisor,
> Do you have an evaluation SKAS patch available for 64-bit Linux (2.6.11) on
> the AMD Opteron? Or has this project taken a back seat to other tasks?
Yes to both question, i.e. we are not yet there. I actually *did* a port to
64-bit
Comments inline
On 15/04/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > Hi there,
>
> > In my continuing saga (which some are becoming familiar with) to get
> > UML 2.6.x working at all I have been given access to another machine
> > to deve
On Thursday 14 April 2005 06:25, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Hi there,
> In my continuing saga (which some are becoming familiar with) to get
> UML 2.6.x working at all I have been given access to another machine
> to develop on and my old machine is going to disappear.
> This machine is Debian Sarge w
