Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:26, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Currently they are the same for 2.4 and 2.6, but worst case that might
change in future versions.
Yes maybe in principle, however the errno values are part of the ABI.
I agree.
Only debugger could note this, as ERESTART_XX
Bastian Blank wrote:
But anyway, this errno is internal. So there exists
no "host's ERESTARTNOINTR".
As Blaisorblade pointed out, ptrace interface also is
part of the ABI. User programs using ptrace *can* see
ERESTARTNOINTR and all the other ERESTART.
So there exists "host's ERESTARTNOINTR", b
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 22:02, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:33:56PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> | Mail-Followup-To: [email protected]
>
> Please fix your MUA.
>
> > TX for the info, but sorry, I guess you missundersto
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:33:56PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
| Mail-Followup-To: [email protected]
Please fix your MUA.
> TX for the info, but sorry, I guess you missunderstood. We were not talking
> about kernel's include/linux/errno.h, but ab
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:26, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> >>Jeff Dike wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> >
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
ERESTARTNOINTR in my /usr/include, inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
2.6.11 shows:
| $ grep ERESTARTNOINTR -r .
| ./linux/errno.h:#define ERESTARTNOINT
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
These patches are tested a
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:16, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
> > ERESTARTNOINTR in my
Please note:
> > /usr/include
> > , inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
>
> 2.6.11 sh
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
> ERESTARTNOINTR in my /usr/include, inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
2.6.11 shows:
| $ grep ERESTARTNOINTR -r .
| ./linux/errno.h:#define ERESTARTNOINTR 513
And it i
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> >>Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> >>UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
> >>These patches are tested a bi
10 matches
Mail list logo
