[uml-user] New RHEL4 root fs won't boot......

2006-06-26 Thread Simon Matthews
I built a root filesystem, after reviewing the mkrootfs script and the list of rpms were installed in the Fedora-Core4 root FS. However, it won't fully boot. Any suggestions: [42949374.12] ClusterIP Version 0.8 loaded successfully [42949374.12] arp_tables: (C) 2002 David S. Miller [429493

Re: [uml-user] Building RHEL4 root filesystem?

2006-06-26 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 04:49:52PM -0700, Simon Matthews wrote: > Does anyone have any advice on how to build a root filesystem for > RedHat Enterprise 4? I have searched the documentation and all I see > are pointers to a number of root filesystem builders (none of which > seem to support RHEL4),

[uml-user] Building RHEL4 root filesystem?

2006-06-26 Thread Simon Matthews
Does anyone have any advice on how to build a root filesystem for RedHat Enterprise 4? I have searched the documentation and all I see are pointers to a number of root filesystem builders (none of which seem to support RHEL4), not instructions on how to go about the process. Regards, Simon Using

Re: [uml-user] iptables

2006-06-26 Thread Christian Bockermann
With "-t XXX" you select the TABLE to modify/view To display the forward-chain you can just do iptables -t filter -nvL FORWARD ("-t filter" is default and can be left out) For example, to make uml reach the outside world and protect uml against connections from outside you would do

Re: [uml-user] iptables

2006-06-26 Thread paul john
thank you guys all. 2006/6/26, Christian Bockermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: What's /etc/resolv.conf look like in your UML? You have to specify aname server here.Does your FORWARD-chain allow udp 53 from 192.168.0.0/24 to the       is this forward-chain of host ?  i don't know how to ? iptables -t FOR

Re: [uml-user] iptables

2006-06-26 Thread Christian Bockermann
What's /etc/resolv.conf look like in your UML? You have to specify a name server here. Does your FORWARD-chain allow udp 53 from 192.168.0.0/24 to the nameservers you have in /etc/resolv.conf? Greets, Chris Am 26.06.2006 um 15:52 schrieb paul john: > in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A

Re: [uml-user] iptables

2006-06-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 26 June 2006 15:52, paul john wrote: > in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j > MASQUERADE" to enable umls accessing the world . but can't resolve domain > name , if you just give a ip , in umls can ping out the world .but if give > a domain name , can't , i

Re: [uml-user] skas patches for 2.6.17

2006-06-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 26 June 2006 06:18, David Arendt wrote: > hi, > > I just wanted to know if 2.6.17 skas patches are planned for near future ? Already released, I just missed to announce them -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (S

[uml-user] iptables

2006-06-26 Thread paul john
in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE" to enable umls accessing the world . but can't resolve domain name , if you just give a ip , in umls can ping out the world .but if give a domain name , can't , i don't know what's problem . please . -- skype id (flo

Re: [uml-user] Kernel-Ooops

2006-06-26 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:06:55AM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: > I'm getting this sometimes in my UML-instances. It doesn't crash them > but I'd like to solve it. If it happens it will appear in all > instances at the same time. Any idea what goes wrong here? It's not an oops, just a warning.

[uml-user] about networks

2006-06-26 Thread paul john
read many mails .  and i have some confuse,     in my env. my host has only one nic.   and only one unic external IP , and in the host , running two uml instances. here is my will do.        i will ifup tap0 tap1  and assign 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 so as the uml (uml

[uml-user] Kernel-Ooops

2006-06-26 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, I'm getting this sometimes in my UML-instances. It doesn't crash them but I'd like to solve it. If it happens it will appear in all instances at the same time. Any idea what goes wrong here? [44059948.65] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! [44059948.65] [44059948.65] EIP: 000